Hello!
You've deleted a whole lot of objects here: a parking lot, an access aisle, a vegetated area + a number of trees.

One of the results is that way/927801230 is now disconnected from other roads, but more importantly, I'm wondering why you deleted all these objects. Was this by accident?

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=111859762#19/46.04758/14.49576

Thanks a lot for the clarification. I agree, this should be reported to SC. Yes, if both cycleway and footway have the same surface, surface=* should be sufficient (any sane data consumer will assume that they both have this surface).

I'm not going to revert your edits as I don't think they are dangerously "wrong"; but I do think they are unnecessary and mildly bothering for future editors. So best is to ask SC to change this behaviour.

Thanks a lot again!

Thanks a lot for your edit. For the future, if you can:
(a) Add oneway=yes (if applicable), so that routing apps won't direct cyclist on the path in the opposite (wrong) wrong way.
(b) Adjust the cycleway tags of the adjacent road accordingly.

Hi jetomit,
Not to critisize your effort, but may I ask, why you add footway:surface and cycleway:surface although surface=* is already set. If they all have the same value (e. g. asphalt), there is no need to be extra-specific (footway:surface is already implied by surface). There is only need to be this specific if footway:surface and cycleway:surface are different. Otherwise, this only leads to overtagging with no gain in information; which unnecessarily makes features harder to understand and to maintain.

Some of these buildings seem not to exist anymore. They are visible on the older GURS but not on the newer Ljubljana Orthophoto (2020).

Done.

Sorry the above comment was my alter ego :-)

Hi village,
ich weiß, dass es da verschiedene Auffassungen gibt. Es waren schon viele Fußwege da, die aber nicht verbunden waren. Ich stand vor der Wahl, entweder die bereits bestehenden zu löschen, oder den vorgefundenen Mapping-Stil in der Nachbarschaft zu übernehmen.

Von mir aus kannst du die gerne wieder löschen; kann gut mit beiden Lösungen leben.

Erledigt.

Done. Happy if someone can check!

Sorry kartler; kann verstehen, dass du verärgert bist. Es steckte keine böse Absicht dahinter. Werde mich die Tage darum kümmern. Danke fürs Bescheid geben.

Sorry, I'll take care of this in the coming days. Thanks for pointing this out.