Hi,

Thanks for quality review and flagging this. It has no meaning, it's just a mistake. I've corrected it to bridge=yes.

Happy mapping.

Hi,

Welcome to Openstreetmap!

Thanks for adding the bus stops.

It seems you accidentally used a wrong tag. They should be highway=bus_stop, not amenity=bus_station. bus_station would be for a larger area with several bus_stop (see OSM wiki amenity=bus%20station)

Don't worry, transport mapping is quite complex in OSM, so it's natural not to get these things right on the first time. :-)

Happy mapping!

Hi,
When you map sidewalks, please make sure to adjust the sidewalk=* tag of the adjacent street accordingly

The results of the forum poll suggests your tagging is much more popular.

However, I'm going to remove the now redundant foot=designated (it's implied on highway=footway)

Hello,

Thank for your comment.

1) May I ask what is your function is OSM and who is "we"?

2) On the issue at hand: What is the best and easiest way to cleanly repair the large-scale mapping of non-existing features done by the reverted changesets?

Hi,

Just a question. I've noticed you started adding neighbourhoods and districts in Ljubljana.

Do you have a source for the exact extend or are these just rough outlines based on your local knowledge?

Excuse me.

I just tried to revert my own revert, but it failed because the tram line contained nodes of previous changeset that I had to revert.

I'm afraid you'll have to map again the sections where visible remains still exist.

Really sorry for that. I hope you keep up you enthusiasm and continue mapping (existing things).

Hi,

Could you explain what exactly has been "fixed"?

I had tagged sections of PST like way/32071700 as highway=track because they are wide enough for emergency vehicles. This information is lost after the change to highway=footway

But I'm not sure about the correct tagging, so I've created a thread in the forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/whats-the-correct-tagging-for-footways-outside-urban-buildup-that-are-wide-enough-for-emergency-vehicles/104921

Hi,

Thing that don't exists anymore should not be mapped on OSM. See railway=abandoned

For things that existed in the past, openhistorical map is the right place.

I'm reverting this edit.

I'm removing the unclear closed=yes tag as there has been no response.

Hi,

You changed the highway type of Slovenska cesta to living_street. May I ask on what grounds? According to the wiki, it would imply that pedestrians have the right of way over other road users; which I think this is not the case.

In a previous discussion about Slovenska cesta, we had settled on not using living_street: changeset/103082368

Are there good reasons to revert that?

Ok, I've done that.

The tag is already in use, but not widespread. Best would be if somebody documented it on the wiki in a few lines.

I agree with your reasoning.

How about tagging it natural=basin then?

Aerial imagery shows there are steps. Reverting the edit.

Then, why do you keep highway=steps?

Then, the correct tag would be access=private. But what about pedestrians? Are they allowed to pass? I'm reverting this because the changeset comment contradicts the tagging.

Not even by foot? Is privately owned? I'm reverting this because I believe this is a tagging mistake.

Please describe in more detail. Is this under construction? Can only cars not access? What about pedestrians? Or bikes?

I'm reverting this as it seems likely this is a tagging mistake.

1) Please do not add access=no to highway=construction.

highway=construction is sufficient.

2) Make sure the highway classification survives. To do so, add construction=secondary (in this case).

Hi,
please read the wiki documentation about the tags that are relevant to your edits. These roads should be tagged with construction=secondary

highway=construction?uselang=en#How_to_map