There's a parking mapped a bit further north: node/3876340592

Did you perhaps mean that one?

Hi,

it has been reported that there is no parking space here: note/2714444

Aerial imagery also shows no parking space.

Did you perhaps map this in the wrong location?

You've created a cycle route for PST:relation/11568094
An almost identical hiking route already exist: relation/86438

To my (limited) knowledge, this is only a hiking route, not a cycling route. But I may be wrong. Do you know whether this documented as a cycling route anywhere? (website, legal documents or signage on the ground)

Yep, let's hope for the 2021 orthophoto to go online soon!

Hi,

Thanks for adding the new roundabout. Just FYI you broke the bus relations of line 27 by doing so (you forgot to add them to the roundabout). I'll fix that, this is just to give you a heads up for future similar cases.

Looks like a mapping error, thanks Rainer!

I've corrected it.

See my comment here: changeset/119651803

Then, the correct mapping is a closed way (interpreted as area in this case) with tag building=apartments (on the building outline).

A node tourism=apartment is wrong in this case.

See the wiki entries (admittedly, the example images in both articles are somewhat misleading):
building=apartments
tourism=apartment

Happy mapping!

The bench is already mapped 3 metres away from here.

Hi!

Are you sure these are tourism/holiday apartments? Or are these houses regular houses with apartments?

Did you want to map this as a tourism/holiday appartment intentionally? Or did you rather mean building=apparments ?

Hi!

Two things:
(1) Are you sure these are vacation/tourism apartments? Or did you rather want to tag the houses as building=apartment (regular residential houses where people live)? If these are actually tourism apartments, do they have a name or a website or a physical sign in front of the house?

(2) Can I mark your notes as resolved? (they seem to be addressed by your edit).
e. g. note/3107908

Wiki pages for residential apartment buildings and tourism apartments:
building=apartments

tourism=apartment

"definitiv" würde ich nicht sagen. Es ist schon ein Grenzfall.

Ein sportlicher Mensch auf einem Fixie hat hier keine Probleme,
aber ein normal-fitter Mensch auf einer langen Tour mit zwei oder vier Satteltaschen hat schon ganz schön zu kämpfen und eine Oma mit E-Bike, die mit OSM-Daten ihre Route plant, wird hier eine böse Überraschung erleben.

Ok, I've fixed this. (user seems inactive)

True! I've added them.

I understand your preferred style is to map sidewalks separately, while I prefer only doing if there is a cycle track involved. My reasoning is that for a cyclist it is a big pain to cross a raised kerb, while for pedestrians it's no effort at all, but I acknowledge that there is no community consensus.

I now did the change my style (obviously) :-), but please feel free to change to your style if you wish. :-)
(just a reminder: keep in mind to change sidewalk=right to sidewalk=separate on the main road in that case)

Oh, no troubles caused!
Can't make an omelette without breaking some eggs.

Understand. :-)

I imagine Vespucci might be the Android app of choice for cases like this. (in case you haven't come across that)

Cleanest solution seemed to be to remove it, sorry. (I didn't get any response, so I took the liberty to just do it)

Hi!
You removed all tags from node/4171822038/
which was previously tagged as restaurant "Loving Hut". It is now a standalone tag-less node.

Was this on purpose?

Hi oliverix,
Welcome to openstreetmap! Thanks for your contribution.

One point to help you get started:
When you add new highways (that is roads, footways, cycletracks, etc.), make sure they're connected to existing ones at locations where they cross or end. This means, if it is possible to change from one to another in the real world, then both ways should have a common node in openstreetmap (and only then). Otherwise, routing software doesn't know that there is a connecting (you can change from one to another).

You may have noticed that iD (the editor that you used) gave you some warnings when you uploaded your changes. They were for this exact reason.

Happy mapping!