changeset/95708259

my impression that the most of the reverted changeset focuses on abandoned stuff, cluttering up a derelict building. the northern part of the edit might be an improvement, maybe, or maybe not. without a plan to check the area in person, it's difficult to say.

changeset/95708146

I support 1T-money in this revert. the addition of an already disappeared building, and the deletion of Mueblería Charlie are minor errors, compared to not attempting correct so many other "Kaart Buildings", and not addressing so many other split buildings, and doing cosmetics on older mistakes, keeping the mistake.
let's hope we can talk about this in the group, and help each other becoming better at interpreting aerial photography.

hi 1T-money, I'm not so sure about this one. one of the buildings Karen mapped does not exist, and another looks more like ruins than a building, but I would not have reverted the whole changeset. food for discussion I suggest.

I agree with 1T-money: the mapping was based on good quality but outdated Bing photography. most buildings had in the meanwhile disappeared. we hope that the organizers of mapping 9844 will check with the mappers in Panamá, we stay in contact with the above Telegram group, and we keep an eye on the official forum#61.

quite right: the mapping was based on good quality but outdated Bing photography. most buildings had in the meanwhile disappeared.

bueno, está mejor y te habrás enterado que puedes seguir:
Way: 881449046
Way: 881449047
Way: 881449044

no sé cuántos edificios habrá entre este (que has partido en tres) y la Avenida Roosevelt. no quieren mapear ese coso gigante que queda entre las dos calzadas?

(yo no entiendo porqué se pusieron en Colón, cuando estaban mapeando zonas golpeadas por Eta.) (también vuestro proyecto en Guna Nega sigue incompleto.) (y siguen incumpliendo con lo que el DWG les dijo en el texto del bloqueo.)

ten en cuenta la sugerencia en la página "cosas que pasan" (a veces es muy sencillo, aquí puedes aplicar la solución que describo.)
ten también en cuenta que "living_street" es una calle en que el peatón tiene más derecho de uso que los carros. en el grupo acabamos de compartir una foto que lo hace muy visual.

hola. esto está mucho mejor, obviamente! ¡gracias! (entonces estamos alineando a Bing, me parece bien, por lo menos mientras no tengamos trazas GPS.)
la barriada es gigante, sería oportuno buscar fuentes de información digitales, el algo que están intentando unos maperos del grupo, en Santiago y David.
te vuelvo a invitar al grupo, donde los encuentras.

dear @amymack, please be welcome to our Telegram group, where local mappers try to reach agreements on standards. YouthMappers constantly receive invitations to engage with the rest of the community, but we haven't had the pleasure yet.

right, so 1T-money restored the lost Kaart information, now you can redo the buildings you had added, but please do consider the instructions in our wiki regarding Kaart buildings.

please check the "hay árboles" paragraph.

@mariotomo/diary/395004

and do find a non-threatening way to tell the original mapper to remove that ridiculous "esta casa pasa por una carretera" name. I don't dare say anything any more to these kids, I scare them away and they never manage to find the courage to answer.

> the mapper got a little carried away here

more than "a mapper/here", it's something you need to review in your procedures. I selected a random area around here, and looked for highway=track with more than a point every 10m. If I choose less than 1km and more than 100 points, I get 45 objects, by 34 authors, 33 of which working for Apple.

to give you examples to start with:

Way: 295051315
Length: 877.2 m
166 Nodes:
Way: 296874846
Length: 4.91 km
502 Nodes:
Way: 295077631
Length: 3.55 km
506 Nodes:
Way: 151469068
Length: 4.60 km
550 Nodes:

from Morocco, I got this comment from people looking at #adt digitizing ways: »je pense que cette cartographie est soit fait avec del IA soit avec des gens qui ne connaissent pas le terrain«. or both, isn't it? ;-)
can you disclose details on how you are digitizing? as to provide you feedback you can use to improve your protocols?

you know what is a "vereda"?

changeset/95631118
in other words: please restore the lost Kaart information, and be careful with changeset comments.

Hi Rachel, apologies to you, I should have used the `id` of the building, not the value of its `name`. the object isn't there any more, for it's been deleted, and its information not preserved as I was hinting: way/390332611/history

hola. tienes interés en seguir mapeando? tenemos un grupo Telegram para apoyarnos y varios recursos online en la comunidad OSM. me cuentas, te envío los enlaces.

necesitas ayuda? no entendiste a qué me refiero con mi comentario?