Given the input here and on the mailing list, I shall perform a revert today.

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

See my posting on talk-au:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2022-October/016637.html

The correct comment is:
DWG revert due to Vandalism.

The correct comment is:
DWG revert due to Vandalism.

The correct comment is:
DWG revert due to Vandalism.

The correct comment is:
DWG revert due to Vandalism.

The correct comment is:
DWG revert due to Vandalism.

This tagging had more errors.
I now have completely retagged it:
changeset/128077280
Is your comment the name of that pond?

What do you mean with "vvbb"?
Please read:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

What do you mean with "fff"?
Please read:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

What do you mean with "fffggg"?
Please read:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

What do you mean with "fffggg"?
Please read:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

Thanks for notifying me. Restored.
changeset/128067101

Thanks for fixing it!

En wat bedoel je precies met ford=no op dat pad? Toch niet dat auto's van het merk Ford er niet mogen komen?
Maar wat dan wel?

And we have 56 times ford=boat??

And also 231 times ford=ford!!

I found 570 times ford=no!

Did you reach a conclusion yet?

Sorry for the huge bounding box! Another changeset at the other side of the ocean was still open...