You could improve tagging by adding the code for the traffic_sign to the relevant highway.
traffic_sign=*
I think it should be:
traffic_sign=SE:D7
according to:
https://www.transportstyrelsen.se/sv/vagtrafik/Vagmarken/Pabudsmarken/

And I like to add this:
What kind of traffic_sign is there on that path, if any? Luckily we have mapillary:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=56.89246122622751&lng=12.50353711564344&z=17&pKey=I8EzUEUQcaW9B7qHs5zj_A&focus=photo
In the wiki this is documented:
highway=path
Hence this is NOT a cycleway but a PATH where both cyclist and pedestrian have equal rights.
Hence your retagging is wrong. Please change it back to what it was.

I'm still awaiting your answer Gizbar.
Please inform me why you removed the buildings.

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

The addition of a node and mark it as a building is not correct. Also all the details you have added to that node are already included in the building multi polygon.
Why did you add this node?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

Dear Gizbar,
The DWG received a complaint about this changeset where you have removed a number of houses as can be seen on achavi:
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=76308299

From the underlying aerial photo for that region (as can be seen in JOSM or iD) I still can see the houses that you have removed.
Removing data from OSM - without contacting the mapper who has added that data is considered as bad practice.
Was there a reason for you to remove that data?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

You don't have to put the name "pond" on the map because the name is used to give a name to something and not to describe what something is! Because that is allready given in the tags your have chosen.
E.g. if something is tagged as "building=yes", you should not also use "name=building"!

So, can you remove that "name=pond" yourself now?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

You don't have to put the name "pond" on the map because the name is used to give a name to something and not to describe what something is! Because that is allready given in the tags your have chosen.
E.g. if something is tagged as "building=yes", you should not also use "name=building"!

So, can you remove that "name=pond" yourself now?
Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

User Md jins had added the name of his college (Netrokona) to all the nodes and ways he had added to the map. Hence there were numerous roads, buildings etc. with that name.
I have changed that to source=Netrokona.

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

Note: the inclusion of Dubaha is from a different changeset that was still open.
It wasn't effected in anyway.

Also you are using landuse on a node instead of using it on an polygon.
Please read this:
osm.wiki/Map_Features
and this:
osm.wiki/Get_help
before continuing with your edits!

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

You are using the name=* key in a wrong way! It is supposed to show the name of an object, like the name of a building.
Check the wiki pages!
You should start using "source=*".

DId you read my mail to your OSM mailbox?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

I reverted all the data added by user Md jins by accident in the following changesets:

76060638,76062011,76063757,76063876,76063826,76064264,76064036,76064023,76064360,76063961,76064386,76067131,76075461,76075435,76075480,76076654,76076554,76076531,76076695,76076572,76076873,76076561,76076499,76076668,76076957,76076866,76076804,76076819,76076948,76076834,76077105,76077008,76076915,76077198,76077325,76077338,76077985,76077994,76078026,76078004,76078402,76078437,76078969,76078449,76078391,76078480,76078477,76078409,76078980,76079812,76078952,76078989,76079408,76079001,76079220,76079492,76080096,76081029,76082690,76082564,76082874,76084017,76085842,76085910,76085880,76086942,76087047,76087033,76086965,76087695,76087738,76087859,76088768,76088753,76088837,76089112,76088734,76088980,76088795,76088883,76089062,76089212,76089151,76089129

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

I reverted all data included in the following changesets by user Md Jins:

76075490,76087945,76088032,76088149,76087991,76088189,76087917,76088047,76088204,76088134,76087958,76088084,76088124,76088174,76088230

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

Why do you add hazard=slippery_road to a building?
Why do you add the name=netrokona to that road/building?
Please stop adding tags to places where they don't belong!
And you maybe should start using the ID editor or even better JOSM to control what you are doing and prevent you from making mistakes like this.
Did you read your OSM account mailbox?
I have sent you a message.

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

Why do you add hazard=slippery_road to a building?
Why do you add the name=netrokona to that road/building?
Please stop adding tags to places where they don't belong!
And you maybe should start using the ID editor or even better JOSM to control what you are doing and prevent you from making mistakes like this.
Did you read your OSM account mailbox?
I have sent you a message.

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

Thank you for doing that. Indeed al his early changesets seem to contain many faulty edits.

That is not necessary ff5722 because I'm a member of the DWG and was already informed by other users! Thank you for your offer.
Md jins has contacted me and we are trying to get rid of all his "mistakes".
Best regards
Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

I also sent a mail to your OSM account mailbox. Did you check that?

And you should fix all the mistakes you made!

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

On behalf of the DWG I ask you to stop adding this nonsense information to OSM.
Please report to me what you are trying to do.

Best regards
Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

I'm contacting you on behalf of the Data Working Group of the OpenStreetMap foundation.
Your addition of a Craft stand builder in the middle of the sea doesn't make any sense.
Please tell us what you are trying to add.

Best regards
Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group