marczoutendijk's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 100791641 | DWG revert:
|
|
| 100859075 | Hi,
Hola,
Marc Zoutendijk
|
|
| 100859816 | Hi,
Marc Zoutendijk
|
|
| 100646034 | Could you please give more meaningful comments instead of just the letter "s"
Marc Zoutendijk
|
|
| 100659934 | ||
| 100659409 | Could you please give more meaningful comments instead of just the letter "g"
Marc Zoutendijk
|
|
| 100659934 | Could you please give more meaningful comments instead of just the letter "h" Marc Zoutendijk
|
|
| 100000369 | Amazing you were the one with the 1st changeset and your still here! Congratulations! |
|
| 100000000 | Congratulations! |
|
| 99850768 | ||
| 99851526 | ||
| 99852220 | ||
| 99852843 | ||
| 99853421 | ||
| 99410218 | Then you could consider using:
If you know the individual buildings then use:
Marc Zoutendijk
|
|
| 99410218 | What kind of "construction" is going on here? |
|
| 99436217 | DWG revert by
|
|
| 99436102 | DWG revert by changeset/99526484 |
|
| 99393634 | unclassified is a better choice for what you are trying to achieve. |
|
| 98564709 | "Rusty muddy water" as operator, is that a joke?
|