Bonjour,
bien vu, merci pour la correction !
Par contre par convention le tag réseau ne se met pas sur les arrêts mais seulement sur les itinéraires node/5527829168
Cordialement,
Marc

d'ailleurs est-ce réellement des œuvre d'art ? PA1078 est très étrange pour un nom

Bonjour,
Merci pour ces ajouts. cependant si une station de métro contient une oeuvre d'art, il ne faut pas modifier la station de métro mais crée un nouvel objet pour l'oeuvre d'art.
Cordialement,
Marc

Bonjour,
Merci pour ces ajouts. cependant si une station de métro contient une oeuvre d'art, il ne faut pas modifier la station de métro mais crée un nouvel objet pour l'oeuvre d'art.
Cordialement,
Marc

Bonjour et bienvenue osm.wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
Merci pour les ajouts.
n'hésitez pas à ajouter le nom "Chemin de la Cabanne" sur la voie concernée, l'information semble manquante
Cordialement,
Marc

Hello,
I restored the private path and added the private access restriction. This is the only way to avoid that the next contributor adds again the visible path on the satellite imagery.
Have a nice day,
Marc

Hello,
node/1178659117
what public service is available at this location?
Regards,
Marc

Hello,
node/1178659117
what public service is available at this location?
Regards,
Marc

Hello,
node/687745992
why not putting the ref of the pipeline "Leg T-M4" on the pipeline itselft ?
Regards,
Marc

Hello,
way/93362591
what public service is available at this location?
Regards,
Marc

Hello Jerry,
thanks for the feedback.
feel free to improve the objet, your have the local knownledge I didn't have :)
if you don't want it, I can of course take care of it
Regards,
Marc

Bonsoir,
Merci pour votre retour et les améliorations.
j'ai changer description en website pour l'url de l'établisement.
j'ai aussi ajouté que c'était la construction d'une école.
n'hésitez pas à vérifier si vous le souhaitez.
Cordialement,
Marc

Hello Polarbea,

I did all research I can to try to find the website of this poi (that i have informed on other objects with source=POI), i searched without finding images with a compatible source, i searched without finding a compatible license source having the information i was looking for. that's why i put a transparent comment that the addition is only guessing made on the basis of the existing name in osm, it was the meaning of the comment to be aware that despite everything, there remains a risk of error to have a clubhouse whose name speaks about shooting and which could be a club having another activity. it's the issue with mixing a building and an amenity on one objet, there remains always a doubt if the name is the one of the building or the current use.
I usually send a message to previous contributors in this kind of situation, I didn't do it for this item, I just did it to confirm the information

Regards,
Marc

Hello,
node/247463903
From the name, I have guessing it's a clubhouse about shooting, it's that true ? can you review my edit ?
Feel free to add website or contact.
Regards,
Marc

Hello,
node/247463903
From the name, I have guessing it's a clubhouse about shooting, it's that true ? can you review my edit ?
Feel free to add website or contact.
Regards,
Marc

Hello,
node/247463903
From the name, I have guessing it's a clubhouse about shooting, it's that true ? can you review my edit ?
Feel free to add website or contact.
Regards,
Marc

Hello,
node/247463903
From the name, I have guessing it's a clubhouse about shooting, it's that true ? can you review my edit ?
Feel free to add website or contact media.
Regards,
Marc

Dear Polarbear,

Thank you for your questions.

about building=clubhouse
building type as the 1st purpose ? one can very well build a building having the shape of a church (building=church building:use=residential) which would never have been used as a church (if one wishes to remember the first use of the building, it seems to me that the life cycle or ohm are preferable).
the appearance of the building being unknown to me, that's why I put yes, so that its real value can be informed by the next contributor.

about "not knowing if it is currently used as such" the previous version of the object describes a clubhosue club=sport, it's from osm itself that I "know" it's a clubhouse

I'm using source=extrapolation as as described on the wiki for key:source *The information was extrapolated from other information* : this changeset is only using already existing info from osm, I did not use any external source, no sat images, no survey.
is my understanding of its description on the wiki wrong and if so what is the most suitable value ?
it's not guessing.

Regards,
Marc

Hello,
way/584989807
it's the office of lifeguard ? or when lifeguard are available and check the beach ? an emergency club ?
Regards,
Marc

Hello SK53 :)
way/240132957
it's a amenity=clubhouse ?
Regards,
Marc