marc__marc's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 34540676 | Hello,
|
|
| 131325556 | you're welcome |
|
| 173337075 |
Hello,
Regards,
|
|
| 165503713 |
Hello,
Regards,
|
|
| 131325556 | Hello,
Regards,
|
|
| 177067026 | Merci pour ton retour.
|
|
| 176927901 | The wiki documentation stating that crossing=* is both mandatory and recommended is obviously incorrect. I fix it. It is obviously a good idea to add crossing=* when you have the information, but it is just as normal not to add it or not to keep a conflicting value when you do not have better information.
|
|
| 177067026 | Bonjour,
|
|
| 176927901 | Hello, Thanks for asking. The usage of crossing=* to describe the marking have been for conflicting values marked/zebra is in practice superseded by the approval of the crossing:markings key to indicate the marking.
it seems you are doing the same for ex with way/687242754/history/3 isn't it ? I have several others changeset about crossing=traffic_signals
Regards,
|
|
| 175865592 | merci pour ton retour, je n'avais pas vu la fusion de nœud |
|
| 175865592 | Bonjour,
|
|
| 163377519 | Hello,
|
|
| 151784832 | Bonjour,
|
|
| 175929500 | Bonjour,
|
|
| 168883739 | Hello,
|
|
| 61793893 | merci pour ton retour |
|
| 46115668 | d'ailleurs au niveau de l'imagerie aérienne, on ne voit pas de cutline, c'est dégagé vers le SO jusqu'à la route et non pas une tranchée dans la végétation.dans osm la ligne de coupe n'est d'ailleurs pas dans la foret puisque celle-ci démare un peu plus loin |
|
| 46115668 | Bonjour,
|
|
| 61793893 | Bonjour,
|
|
| 160841042 | Thanks |