Hello,
thanks for the improvement.
But this world mechanical edition should have been discussed on the talk world list and its documentation page on the wiki and have the changeset tag mechanical=yes in order to facilitate its detection in QA tools
as requested by the procedure osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
Regards,
Marc

Hello,
date:source -> source:date
Regards,
Marc

Hello,
thanks for the improvement.
take the time to upload changeset before traveling :) it help having managable changeset
Regards,
Marc

Hello,
Polderstraat <> Poederstraat : a typo or not ?
way/38750155
Regards,
Marc

Hello,
Polderstraat <> Poederstraat : a typo or not ?
way/38750155
Regards,
Marc

Thanks. I added surface:middle=asphalt

Bonjour,
node/6684403659
la barrière ne devrait pas être superposé au passage piéton, je n'imagine pas les piétons traversé en marchant en équilibre sur la barrière :)
pourrier vous ajuster les 2 éléments selon lequel des 2 se trouve devant l'autre ?
Cordialement,
Marc

Bonjour,
quel est la source ?
le site web de Panorama par exemple parle de l'ouverture de la saison 2023
Cordialement,
Marc

merci pour le retour d'information

Hello,
what's a disued marker ?
the marker itself is disused ?
or the marker is ok but the pipeline is disused ?
Regards,
Marc

instead of deleting (and the next contributor will add them again), I propose payment:cash=limited

it seems that another mapper change it into a drain into a culvert
tunnel=culvert
waterway=drain
changeset/129200861
Regards,
Marc

Hello,
Thanks for the feedback
substance=rainwater ?
osm.wiki/Tag%3Asubstance%3Drainwater
Regards,
Marc

ho yes, I forget to check relations. fixed

no, review of major issue before the proposed edit on Element room :)
check_daate made me think that the contributor would like to come back to it in a while, which seemed to confirm a construction in progress

Bonjour,
vous souvenez-vous ce que vous avez-voulu dire avec code rue 1001 ?
Cordialement,
Marc

way/4005706
toujours en construction ?

that's strange because the validator message made me think that this was a common routine for all foo:conditional keys
but access:conditional=yes @ 09:00-19:00 raise no warning
so it seems perfect valid
i'll open an issue for josm later

and I have no idea how to map the maxstay 2h-2h29 depending of the min of your arrival

thanks your review
I switch the conditional into its own key
parking:authentication:disc:conditional=yes @ 09:00-19:00
but josm complain about bad syntax for conditional restriction