Vielen Dank für die schnelle Erledigung!

Hi.
Sorry for my late reply.
Well, first I thought that it looked really amateurish, so I checked with overpass if this is somewhat common. Turns out it is not. There are only around two other buildings in England with 'staircase' in its name.

Then I saw that it was mapped by an intern (mprhode) around 9 years ago. So I thought that he/she either didn't know about the addr:unit tag or it wasn't established yet.

Personally I think that the map looks cleaner this way and there is no reason to spell it (staircase) out when there's a tag for it. It's also a misuse of the name tag.

But it's up to you. If you think my changes are better undone, feel free to do revert them. No hurt feelings! :)
I started adding the add:unit tag to a few other colleges in Oxford but stopped after you contacted me.

If the staircase number is not part of an actual address, as you said, it could also be mapped using the ref tag. Wdyt?

Cheers,
Lukas

Ich hab "Myflexbox" vor Monaten in den name-suggestion-index hinzugefügt. Ehrlich gesagt bin ich kein großer Fan wenn Markennamen gänzlich in Großbuchstaben geschrieben werden. Erregt nur unnötig Aufmerksamkeit.

Um die Daten in Zukunft dennoch einheitlich zu haben sollte man sich auf eine Schreibweise einigen. Was meint ihr?

https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/blob/579cb6751035523211c1df974a52ec6e7ce0839b/data/brands/amenity/parcel_locker.json#L470

Here you can see that it can't be properly rendered. https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=48.1856312&lon=16.4128491&zoom=18&camera.theta=43.568&camera.phi=-49.561

Oh, I'm talking about way/1099455791#map=19/48.18507/16.41237

Hi 897125012,
Did you remove 'building:part' by accident?
Without it it's not recognised as a part of the building.

Hi,
This looks like a mistake. I will remove the wikimedia_commons tag. Thanks for noticing.

Gallo woodpeck,
Kann ich machen. In den Changesets von heute waren die Fachrichtungen entweder bereits in note, designation oder description vorhanden oder, wie hier, bereits die Webseite vorhanden. Ein einfacher Aufruf reicht.

Hi ivanbranco,
thanks for spotting this mistake. tagging it as =null was not my intent. I should fix it my tampermonkey script.

I queried for =null and fixed it. Thanks again!

Hi,
Thank you for your comment, I did not know about the implications of wide changesets. I'll try to limit my changes to a specific state in the future.

Hallo Wolfgang,
danke fürs Ansehen. ich hab mir gedacht, dass highway=primary falsch ist (weil doppelt), aber der iD-Editor hat eine Linie ohne Eigenschlaften als Fehler gekennzeichnet und hätte es mich nicht senden lassen.

Stimmt, die hätte ich der Historie wegen wiederverwenden können. Danke fürs Erledigen!

Hi,
da hätte ich die Wiki vorher lesen sollen. Habe es gelöscht weil ich dachte es wäre so doppelt gemappt. Hab es rückgängig gemacht. Danke für den Hinweis.

hey,
Why did you replace building=yes with area=yes?

Ah, thank you for clarifying that. Also on Github.

Why don't these changes show up in the buildings history though?

hey parsewski,
wow, that's really strange. I've no idea how I did that. Thanks for letting me know.

I checked all ways and relations in this changeset. This seems to be the only building that got messed up. I'll fix it.
Cheers

das sollte natürlich "Dreifaltigkeit" sein, da hab ich mich verschrieben. Vielen Dank fürs Hinweisen. Habs ausgebessert.
https://www.wien.gv.at/kulturportal/public/identifyGebaeude.aspx?id=ARCH.SZI_P.115894918&mid=f276a0b6-4262-4bef-8b04-42ba6dd19de8&ftype=vienna:ARCH.SZI_P&g=ab52589f-5abd-42f8-96e1-c315c8fc9071&cid=a7d392ae-e043-4f02-ac48-0733a1a285e1

I guess this was a mistake? ;)

Ja, stimmt so. Hat mich auch gewundert, weil ich die Eslarngasse vor Ort nicht gesehen hab'. Aber so stehts auf der Säule und auch in der App. Hab mich gerade nochmal vergewissert.

Please revert your change, as it's changing the height of the whole building and thus deforming the 3D model. https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=48.2158620&lon=16.3592196&zoom=19&camera.theta=47.005&camera.phi=-2.865

the total height is already specified in the bell tower.

Thanks :)

It might, I'll check their GitHub issues once I'm back home.

Thanks for the hint, I removed all poi addresses in the next commit.