OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
53543866

hi hpalbuero,

we noticed your edits was part of an organized edits, we documented it here: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/33

Also using streetview is not allowed in OSM.

53308757

hi hpalbuero,

we noticed your edits was part of an organized edits, we documented it here: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/33

Also using streetview is not allowed in OSM.

53630367

its the white sign: https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/353700/32947045-064b9c6a-cbc0-11e7-8b62-c8378ccea236.png

53630367

Hi Jan,

This the mapillary I used: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=5c24R-YQaeEW-39S7dOprQ&focus=photo&lat=37.783862&lng=-122.393088&z=17

From the image, it shows only HOV restriction.

53209008

You added a turn restriction on a cycle route. Curious if this is valid: relation/7677436/history

Keep on mapping.

51502902

Instead of the name tag, could the fixme be used instead?

50068382

There were duplicated road segments as a result of this revert. Per OSM-US list, this is a compromise to remove the sapm. They are all fixed now: https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/310

49670819

Thanks for reply. I haven't check the data completely but a quick look seems they are all good. However, I encourage you to upload as often as possbile so that we don't have a changeset that is too big. Thanks for mapping.

49670819

Hi, PanierAvide. This edit spans the whole US. Can you point to a documentation in the wiki about this edits. On quick look this is a mechanical edit and should follow community guidelines: osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

48449704

@Streptokilla, welcome to OSM! A couple of issues Im seeing in these edits and the surrounding area:

- invalid relation in landuse=forest
- pedestrian tag to a park
- landuse=forest to a leisure=park

Some edits doesn't correspond to what I'm seeing in the imagery. Hope someone local can verify.

48270769

There are a lot on non-existing parks and ponds here. Deleted them. I also commented on your other changes on best practices. changeset/48324007

48270484

Hi Nikos welcome to OpenStreetMap!
I've removed some of edits mostly non existing meadows and streams.
Some of your edits are good so I did not reverted everything. Please continue mapping and I encourage you to read our best practices: osm.wiki/Good_practice

See changes here: changeset/48323804

48203967

Hi Haystacks. Great! Send me a message if you have Qs!

48203967

Hi Haystacks. Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Regarding your edits here, Im looking at satellite imagery as reference and I don't see the park in this area. Are you sure this is a park?

Thanks again for contributing and welcome to our mapping community!

48202080

Hi hawkinsry, after looking at several imagery sources, I don't these footways exist on the ground. In addition the zigzagging of the footways doesn't make sense to me. I reverted your edits here: changeset/48216763

48175984

Hi Martha Leena, thank you for contributing to OpenSTreetMap! I noticed you tagged existing nodes of a building and roads with building=yes. I assume this is a mistake?

I reverted/removed your edits in this changeset: changeset/48184953

This maybe because you are new with using JOSM, that's OK. Let's be careful next time, keep on mapping! If you have questions don't hesitate to contact me.

48151330

Thanks for fixing. I fixed a few more here: changeset/48162693

Changes I made were the following:

- overlapping buildings
- buildings overlap with roads
- misaligned roads

48151330

Hi Bhojaraj, thank you contributing to OSM! I noticed some of your buiding traces have duplicated nodes/ways. Can you fix them. Since you use JOSM, please use the Validator plugin.

48156156

hi Bhojaraj, Thanks for contributing to OSM! I noticed you created a very large building here, perhaps a mistake? Can you fix it now?

47761077

Footways around this area does not exist on imagery, removed them.