Hallo Helmut Kauer,
du hast hier(node/3983503459) "user_defined_other=3,8 m" erfasst.
Wolltest du damit die Höhenbeschränkung der Unterführung bestimmen?
osm.wiki/DE:Key:maxheight
Auf dem Tunnel ist bereits "maxheight=3.2" erfasst...Ist die zulässige Höhe nun 3.8 oder 3.2?
lg

Wieder hergestellt in changeset/44853879

I dont think that the ref=A01 is correct, because in Italy existing a A1 and this bring a lot of conflicts. A01 and A1 sounds similar because I think not all will say "A zero uno" or "A zero one" The A1 go from Milano down to Napoli. and if there existing a other motorway with a 1, 01 or 001 this allways bring conflicts to people.
I dont know other country they have a A1, A01 or A001, etc.

revert in changeset/44602528

revert von changeset/44547709

Prevedeno:
Hi. Hvala za posodobitve! Eden od predlogov, čeprav: lahko uporabite več opisnih seznam sprememb, pripombe, namesto "GBF" (ali kakšno drugo žlobudranje). To bi bilo zelo cenijo vaši kolegi izdelovalci zemljevidov!

Najboljša in vesel kartiranje! :)

@ZigiMigi1103: please stop deleting these data again.
Can you send us some info, why you think that this area is not correct.
thx

@nammala: next time please open a note if you find strange mappings in Europe.
Here are a lot of mapper they have local knowledge(and language) and they don't check changeset comments, because Attila194 use this combination on all his edits: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/kLo

Hallo Attila194,
die Hausnummer 25f die du hier eingetragen hast ist bereits in unserer Datenbank vorhanden. Ebenso ist tourism=attraction bei einer Hausnummer falsch.
Somit habe ich die Hausnummer wieder entfernt.
Ich weiß dass du bereits darauf hingewiesen wurdest, die richtigen keys zu verwenden.
Bitte halte dich an die Vorgaben unserer Wiki: osm.wiki/DE:Adressen
Du kannst dich auch direkt auf unserer Seite(www.osm.org) anmelden und hier die Daten ändern, denn maps.me ist in seinen Funktionen beschränkt.
So kannst du beispielsweise Satellitenbilder verwenden die dir das erfassen/bearbeiten erleichtern.
lg

Hi poornibadrinath,
you deleted here a lot of data.
Next time check data bevore deleting, because no all nodes/ways what added/changed Attila194 are wrong.
User cxs had a lot of work to recreat all addresses you deleted here.
way/453382826
Also I have to recreate a fuel station deleted from you in this changeset:
way/173529807
In Europe are a lot of active mapper, so next time please open a error report and wait with deleting.

Bitte sieh dir die Windräder noch ein mal an.
note/629457

If this is private, you can use access=private and if this was the SP205 there is nothing wrong if I add old_ref to the track and the private part in the south.
The bridge should be mapped with access=private, old_ref=SP205 and on the north end of the bridge noexit=yes, because this bridge existing for real.

why have you deleted the bridge what I added here? way/459208064
I can see this perfect on the Bing image and all other what we can use for OSM.
Also the way from north to south for me looks like the old part of the SP205, and so I added old_ref=SP205.
Ant at last, the enter in a roundabout should not connected with the same node as a exit.
Also you have edited(very little) the track what I have added in the north of the roundabout.
Why you changed all these after I made this?
And if you revert a changeset from a other user, you have to write a better changeset comment.

Please give me some answer here!

All these links are from ANAS or using data from ANAS.
OSM use numbers what are on the streetsings and not the numbers what using some site they not can be used as source.
osm.wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground
corps.it link is from 2015 and use part of data from ANAS link in your first post.
motorionline.com quote:"Fonti Dati: ANAS e altre fonti istituzionali".
mobilita.org use data(2015) from first ANAS link you posted above.
siracusatimes.it use the same data(2015) from ANAS.
latest link from you is from ANAS from 2015.
Because all you links are from ANAS and from 2015 and the image from Mapillary is from middle 2016, I changed the ref to that from Mapillary: "ref=aut.CT-SC" and "unsigned_ref=A01".

for me this looks like a not official number from ANAS.
The immage from mapillary is from August 2016 and the pdf from your link is from 2015(only this pdf use A01 for this motorway).
Also is to check, if you have the license to import data from ANAS website to OSM!

Hi fayor,
why have you changed the "ref=A CT-SR" from Autostrada Catania-Siracusa to "ref=A01"?
There is no "A01" in Italy.
what are you using at source for this change?
Correct ref described in Wikipedia should be "ref=aut.CT-SR", and Mapillary image show also "ref=aut.CT-SR":
https://d1cuyjsrcm0gby.cloudfront.net/Ztqwst1l1NEgoPdq43v5_A/thumb-2048.jpg

Sry dass ich nicht geantwortet habe.
Hatte Probleme mit meiner Email.
Da die Kommentare nur an die Email gesendet werden, ist mir dieser Fehler entgangen.
Ich habe vor einiger Zeit all die unnötigen turnlanes:turns entfernt die ich in OSM erstellt habe.
lg

Hallo AndiLeni,
OsmAnd erstellt nicht automatisch einen Name.
ich habe hier eine Bushaltestelle mit OsmAnd erstellt und es wurde nicht automatisch ein Name eingetragen.

Wenn du auf "POI erstellen" in den obersten Feld keinen Name eingibst, sondern nur in "Benutzerdefiniert" die Bushaltestelle auswählst, wird auch kein Name erfasst.

hier kannst du die Bushaltestelle ansehen:
node/4511373239/history
ich habe sie wieder entfernt da ich sie nur aus Testzwecken erstellt habe.
lg

Please reed this comment and fix the relation/4108738
changeset/26524377

Hi nogajun,
please use "bridge:name" and not "bridge_name".
Some months ago the Japanese community have decided to use only "bridge:name".
please no longer use "bridge_name".
regards