Hi, the better way to solve this issue would be a turn restriction (no right turn) with an exception for bicycles and foot. If you like I can do that later.
Greetings
Stephan

Hi, just added "forward" and "backward" roles to the oneway parts of the splitted bike routes. And added Eurovelo10 route to your Østersøruten. And deleted a cycleway that is physically non existing.
Lets wait for Osmose :)

Thanks for your advice. Just added some roles for the bikeroute relations. Hope I got it right.

Thank you. Already changed width

That is right. But I do not know the width exactly enough.
I know there are different opinions wether tertiary or unclassified "fits" better. Following the wiki narrow roads where cars cannot pass without reducing speed might distinguish unclassified from tertiary.
Please feel free to revert, I don't mind. Maybe you can tell me the reason then.

Hallo,
ja, da hast du Recht. Das tag kannte ich bisher nicht. Habe es geändert.

Hallo, du hast den Bahnübergang von Schwarzenpfost zur B105 eingezeichnet. Meiner Erinnerung nach ist dieser rückgebaut und nicht mehr vorhanden, so sieht es auch auf den neuesten Bildern bei Mapillary aus. Die Zufahrt nach Schwarzenpfost erfolgt jetzt über Rövershagen-Oberhagen. Da du aber angibst, vor Ort gewesen zu sein, hast du evtl. neuere Infos. Andernfalls müsste der Bahnübergang entfernt werden und die Zufahrtsstraße von aktuell "track" auf wohl "unclassified" geändert werden.

Danke für den Hinweis, hab es korrigiert.

Hallo,
warum hast du die Penzliner Straße und die Zierker Straße auf "unclassified" gesetzt? Gleichzeitig blieb jedoch die ref=L 25 erhalten. Wenn diese Straße zur L-25 gehört (was ich glaube), sollte sie wieder "highway=secondary" werden.

thank you, just corrected

The bridge seems to be reopened. http://www.bane.dk/visNyhed.asp?artikelID=25130
Someone with local knowledge should check this.

Yes, I am. Spent several holidays in Varming some years ago and walked my dog in this area. Actually I traced from Geodatastyrelsen. If that track is no longer existing feel free to delete.

No, I don't have an answer. In larger places the landuse=residential perimeter does not cover the whole place, there might be commercial areas and others belonging to the place as well. Here it is definitely better to put the information in a node. So it might be an option to put the information of all places on a node rather than a perimeter.

That might be a way to tag hamlets or villages. Others prefer to put the information into a node centered in the village and not into the landuse-tag. I think both ways are equal. But it should not be tagged both a node and a landuse with the same information.

Thanks for that, didn't know about this tag. I will add that to the camp_sites I know.

I just added the website of this campsite where all information can be found.
Maybe it should be discussed how those small campsites can be tagged better as there are many more throughout Denmark.

Hi, I found this campsite during research for a bicycle trip in 2014 on www.udinaturen.dk.
I wasn't able to call the owner and when I arrived there he was absent. The description on the website mentioned above says the small campsite is at the backyard of a private house. As it still can be found on the website I do think it exists.

Following your argumentation I will reclassify that road to tertiary till Ulslev. The last part until Strandvejen should be unclassified as it is narrow and not connecting villages.

Thanks for that comment. To my knowledge Østersøvej narrows after the junction with Kirkevej and does not have a centerline anymore. So it does not differ from the other small "unclassified" roads in the area. Thats why I downgraded that section.
If you don't follow this please feel free to reclassify to tertiary.
Regards

Habe die Forumsdiskussionen gelesen. Da ich mich nicht mehr genau an die Beschilderung erinnern kann, versuche ich vor Ort mal nachzufragen und würde dann entsprechend ändern.