You also removed the flood_prone tag from the lowest sections of the towpath, which has been frequent this winter whenever river levels rise slightly above average. This is clear from the amount of silt and mud on top of the path

hello, is there a reason why you reverted my changes tagging these paths as shared-use cycleways? I've commuted through here for the last six months and the "official" towpath is chained shut due to frequent river flooding, so all these paths are used by the vast majority of cyclists heading under the footbridge. Thanks!

hi, I believe this land is Woodland Trust and cycling/horse riding is permitted, what is your source for bicycle=no and horse=no? Thanks

Why are you still doing this? You've been asked so many times to stop

12pjw34 is still at it, damaging the map, nothing has changed changeset/175407373#map=16/51.66596/-2.31429

You've not visited this location; I was here on Sunday, and there are no signs prohibiting access by other users. Stop damaging the map. You've been asked many times to stop doing this https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-access-no-tagging-of-uk-public-rights-of-way/132798

"Confirming on OS maps" is a serious copyright violation

How do you know it's access=no? You haven't visited any of these sites to survey permissions

Why on earth would you tag a public footpath as access=no? You are consistently making disruptive edits. Please delete your account

In accordance with discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/ptv2-tagging-a-bus-route-that-changes-number-halfway-through-journey/138429

Apologies, think that was a mistake on my part. Partially reverted - changeset/173090678#map=19/51.379536/-2.363897

Why are you still doing this? Stop adding access=no to public footpaths

@srbrook thanks!