Thanks for the updates. What sort of access does barrier=fence at node/6025737440 have? foot/bicycle= etc

The cafe is part of the climbing wall so a node inside the building or climbing wall area would be fine. Just like how Costa is mapped within the Oxford Road Tesco Extra building. I don't think that there's any harm in duplicating the address data on both the building and nodes, in fact it would be more useful to include the address on the POI nodes as well to keep all the relevant tags together. After all, the address attributes belong to both the building and the POI feature.

Hi dazzac, thanks for all these edits around Newcastle. There's now 2 Purple Bears node/5961871386 and node/4415157358 so one will need deleting. Is it more of a restaurant or pub?

Hi Stuart, I notice that you've been removing addresses from nodes and remapping some features as nodes. IMO the address also belongs to the (shop) node and should be retained. And when a POI takes up an entire building (like the climbing wall) they should be mapped as buildings.

Thanks Chris, it's a great improvement and was a much needed update. In the editor you can change the background layer to
DigitalGlobe Premium Imagery or Esri World Imagery which are more recent and show the new layout. Any questions just ask. :)

Reverted in 63810814

Hi Eoghan, thanks for the edit. There's already a Hale hamlet node at node/31390030 - do you want to delete one of them? Thanks :)

Should this be tagged as a cafe or restaurant?

It looks like user Mastreme has made a start with reopening it in changeset/63268533. I haven't been to Lancaster recently so I'm not sure if there's been any related road layout changes or not. Could one of you locals take a look? Thanks :)

Given the lack of details and that fact that they don't seem to correspond with anything on bing imagery, I think that this changeset can be reverted.

Welcome to OSM. Looks like you've added your business in the wrong city - this is Newcastle not Bradford! Changeset reverted in 63138882

Deleted in changeset/63136796

Rather than do a double revert, it was easier just to delete them. changeset/63136796

I read somewhere that towers had platforms and staircases whilst masts only had ladders. However there's a lot of crossover between the two tags so either tag is probably suitable for this transmitter.

Hi Jon, I've merged the adjacent path sections together so all the details are in place. I notice that there's a tracktype tag - should this be used on paths which aren't tagged as highway=track? I guess it's redundant given the surface tag.

I only just "fixed" the tagging on this a few weeks ago. Is it really a tower? I'd probably describe it as a mast, based on the wiki descriptions. :)

Thanks for fixing. Do you know if this area has a name? A suburb or neighbourhood node would be useful here if a name exists.

Thanks for this edit. Did you mean to change the levels to 0 on way/59155434 ?

FYI note/1517630

*or someone will survey and fix them