lakedistrict's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 58935348 | Yes, but I probably won't be going that way for a month or so. Thanks :) |
|
| 58935348 | It's here: way/256204861 Perhaps the Skelwith Bridge node can be moved across the river so that it's actually in the parish, maybe at the south end of the bridge? |
|
| 58935348 | Hi, are you sure that Skelwith (node/5615914897) is a separate hamlet from Skelwith Bridge village (node/434301526)? As a local, I suggest deleting the Skelwith hamlet node and making Skelwith Bridge the admin_centre, even though it's on the edge of the boundary. |
|
| 58922494 | @gurglypipe The changeset comment partly translates as "experimental updates" @Lance227 Please note that OSM is a live database and shouldn't be used for test edits. You can use https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/#map=8/54.211/-3.312 for that. Given that this appears to be a test edit and introduces more bad than good, I've reverted it in changeset/58946462. Any questions feel free to ask. |
|
| 58813870 | Secondary is for B roads so unless it's got a B number leave it as tertiary
|
|
| 58591792 | It can take anything from a few minutes to a few days for the main map to update - even longer for some zoom levels. :)
|
|
| 58613846 | Hi Archie, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Yesterday you added some pavements but you deleted them today - was that intentional? Any questions feel free to ask. :) lakedistrict (local mapper in Jesmond) |
|
| 58591792 | Hi Colin, welcome to OSM. Thanks for your detailed edits around Ouseburn - all done to a very good standard! Hope to see more edits from you soon. Any questions just ask. All the best, lakedistrict (local mapper in Jesmond) |
|
| 55958569 | Deleted in changeset/58591500 |
|
| 49216856 | Removed in changeset/58591432 |
|
| 52514459 | Fixed in changeset/58591308 |
|
| 55536721 | Done changeset/58406661 |
|
| 55536721 | It looks like it has a shop front here: http://www.thewestmorlandgazette.co.uk/news/16076294.At_risk_meals_on_wheels_service_saved_thanks_to_Burneside_bakery/ As it has an fhrs:id it's more likely that it's a shop=bakery than an office, although I wasn't aware of it until I saw it on OSM |
|
| 55536721 | Did you mean to map Burneside Bakery (node/5345931621) as an office here? |
|
| 55958569 | Hi Mark, thanks for your edits to OpenStreetMap. Are you sure that there's a spring called "Mark's Spring" on Clavering Place? I'd be surprised if there was, given the location. osm.wiki/Good_practice |
|
| 58216798 | Thanks, I've partially reverted this in changeset/58321493. Another mapper told me elsewhere that sliproads don't need ref numbers so I guess the refs could be moved to destination:ref but that would be a job for another day. |
|
| 58216798 | Hi Paul, what's the source for these edits please? The previous ref tagging reflected what the signs and lane markings said. (see also changeset/56451569) |
|
| 58311876 | I think that leisure=nature_reserve is the better tag anyway, particularly for anywhere managed by the local Wildlife Trusts. I've been using leisure=nature_reserve in South Cumbria so for consistency it's good to see it used in North Lancs too. :) |
|
| 347341 | Hi Ben, I know it's an old changeset but do you remember what these untagged arrowheads are? way/29472088 way/29472091 There's several of them mapped. :) |
|
| 53267684 | Cycle path reinstated in changeset/58114194 |