Ganz versteh ich das jetzt nicht. Und mir ist auch nicht klar, was jetzt geschehen soll: Eigene Relation innerhalb des route master? Oder südliche Relation verlängern? Oder noch was anderes?

wo war 374?

korrekter Name Wagerberg Marterl

Von der Buslinie 372 scheint der letzte Abschnitt (Wagerberg-Kapelle über Thermenstraße und L401 bis Bad Waltersdorf Schulzentrum) zu fehlen, aber die Relationsverschachtelung (route master?) ist mir zu hoch, verstehst Du das?

vielen Dank - ich hatte mich mit der genauen Lage der Ladestation tatsächlich geirrt, weil das eine große Gebäude auch weg ist

Wo kommt der angebliche Name "Nösslach" (bei Huben linksufrig) her? In TIRIS gegenwärtig "Achenaltarm" benannt.

We do not map for the renderer. I am perfectly aware that some OSM data consumers do not render ele-only peaks, but that is no reason for using wrong name-tags.

Here is the Franciscean Cadastral Map (dated 1830) of the area: https://maps.arcanum.com/en/map/cadastral/?bbox=1442001.259199787%2C6016645.1351822885%2C1445225.9463305678%2C6017698.532978344&map-list=1&layers=3%2C4 You can shuffle through different maps by using the "more maps" navigation at the top right, but in no other map, Silbhorn is used, whereas Selbhorn (which clearly means the same mountain) is further south. And the Cadastral Map's aim was not to give precise topographic information of the landscape but to identify and describe plots of land that have to pay taxes.

The more recent editions of most maps do not have a name for this northernmost summit of the Selbhorn Arete. And the term "Selblingshorn" used in the summit register is hardly ever used publicly, so I tend to use it as loc_name, with still no "name" tag applied. There ARE objects that have no widely known current name, so I see no problem in using "alt_name" and / or "loc_name" without having a name tag. There have been considerable discussions on this issue in the Austrian OSM community forum.

Thanks for your kind reply!
The note-tag can be translated: the name "Silbhorn" used in the Franciscean Cadastre certainly stands for the Selbhorn main summit located further south [2655m], because the latter is not marked separately in the Cadastre; the later BEV editions 1:50.000 did delete the term "Silbhorn" for a reason.

daher auch summit:register=yes

im Gipfelbuch steht laut https://www.hikr.org/tour/post71413.html "Selblingshorn"

nein, doch nicht, Görings Hütte wurde hier 1934 neu gebaut, sh. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C3%B6th

diese Hütte scheint eigentlich Neuhütteralm geheißen zu haben, oder?