kingkingHK's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 178089087 | Iirc there are three levels between the APM and the arrivals. I don't remember the exact level relative to the ground, but assuming `level=-2` for the APM is correct, then the gates should be `=3;2`. (Ok I see you fixed it already changeset/178153215) |
|
| 178191616 | I thought we don't do `=bus_station` for on-street termini? Anyway, for future reference: https://hkbus.fandom.com/wiki/%E5%BA%B7%E6%80%A1%E8%8A%B1%E5%9C%92%E7%B8%BD%E7%AB%99 (Also I doubt the "guys from HKBusFandom" will notice this note/changeset, so the minibus stop might never get mapped if we don't do it.) |
|
| 178131849 | Do we really have `surface=fine_gravel` in such an urban area? |
|
| 178137127 | Dupe node/4443950090 ? (and should we even map such things in osm?) |
|
| 178089087 | Re `level=`, aren't there many (non-public, but still used by airport personnel) levels between the ground and the gates, meaning it should be higher than `=2;1`? |
|
| 177963900 | I might be misunderstanding things, but I think semi-detached means sharing exactly one wall with a neighbouring building, and walls separating backyards don't count? |
|
| 177963756 | `building=terrace` is different from `building=house` + `house=terrace`. `building=terrace` is when all of the terraced houses are mapped with a single osm way. `building=house` + `house=terrace` is for terraces where each house is mapped with its own osm way, as in the case here. Not to be confused to `building=house` + `house=semi-detached` which is synonymous with `building=semidetached_house`. |
|
| 177963900 | ...are they not semi-detached? |
|
| 177839722 | 1. It's obviously Central Ferry, not Macau Ferry.
|
|
| 161456988 | `access=no` isn't reclaimed by nature as I said somewhere else, see also note/1499178 . Probably need a survey to check the latest state. |
|
| 150411175 | Is node/10213715620 really just connected to a footway like that? Also, are way/1116751169 and way/1122598161 supposed to connect? |
|
| 177901084 | IIRC no buses stop at way/439462752 , so it probably shouldn't get `bus=yes`. |
|
| 177716084 | Yes, we may always review entire stuffs later (e.g. Family Medicine Clinic), what I am concerned about is your tendency of closing notes with an imperfect/incorrect changeset. |
|
| 177716084 | Don't know what you mean. This changeset is still wrong, regardless of notes or whatever. |
|
| 177719323 | Maybe I am misunderstanding things, but I think it should be `disused:highway=` if it is disused, not only `disused=`. |
|
| 177719323 | way/215656018 troll-tagging? |
|
| 177716084 | For the nth time, you can see a 50 km/h oval after this way. If you disagree with giving speed limits to transition highways for whatever reason, please discuss it elsewhere (e.g. Discord) and don't act until we reach a consensus. |
|
| 177713893 | Is this not a minibus stop? |
|
| 176148703 | After visiting the site myself, indeed no slope maintenance path. Perhaps I misunderstood the government map. I retract my question. |
|
| 176148703 | Sorry for the late comment. So is there really no way to walk between Ma Tau Wai Estate and The Zumurud? Government copyrighted maps say there is a slope maintenance path. |