It seems like there is only one clinic in this building, which should mean that a clinic node is unnecessary?

Sorry if my previous comment was not clear, I meant is the `name=` change really necessary, if the other variant is already document in `alt_name=`? How do you know which one is more correct? Are you sure if "薄刀屻" is wrong when I can find so many uses on the internet?

Isn't there already `alt_name=`?

Really `width=784`?

Then, sounds like it should be `barrier=fence` or `=wall`.

Hi there, what is way/1318182599 ? Does it actually exist? I can't see anything buildings on aerial imagery.

1. Please don't trolltag (osm.wiki/Trolltag). Use `proposed:building=*`.
2. "Proposed Campus Extension of The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology at Clear Water Bay" is a `description=`, not a `name=`.

Please don't trolltag (osm.wiki/Trolltag). Use `proposed:building=*`.

I have reverted this changeset in changeset/176289492 for the following reasons:

1. You have a history of messing with osm data in an attempt to fix a problem with your router.
2. Misunderstanding on how routers work; they don't always update instantly.
3. Please don't delete ways with 10+ versions of history and redraw it.
4. Geometry is worsened after redrawing.
5. Tunnel snapped with unrelated building.
6. Changed `layer=` from -1 to -7 for no apparent reason.
7. `name:en` removed for no apparent reason.
8. I am pretty sure the official name is 中九龍幹線, not 中九龍幹綫.

See changeset/176289291

1. Vehicles from Kai Fuk Road westbound can not go to Shing Kai Road, so it should be kept as `=motorway_link`.
2. The extent of tunnel area is already conveyed with `motorroad=`.

Why is it a `=trunk_link`?

I quote level=*#Multiple_values

> Use a hyphen (-) to specify a range of numbers with no missing values. E.g. the elevator of a 32-storey high-rise with two basement levels will be tagged `level=-2-32`.

Hi there, would `note=level: 2 through 6` be better represented as `level=2-6`?

way/1235498283 ...`=secondary_link`? Why?

Are you sure about the `ele=`? Out-of-copyright maps say otherwise.

Feels like a descriptive name; are you sure?

By the way, do you also know if node/7134763063 node/7134763668 and node/7134763667 exist irl? (Didn't notice them at first as they don't render prominently on carto)

Is it appropriate to use `layer` this way? I quote layer=*

> Ways in buildings (or similar structures like multi-level parking lots, shopping centers, airports, railway stations, some multi-level bridges and roads...) should be mostly described with level=* instead of layer. level=* is used for the physical vertical arrangement of levels (floors, walkways) inside structures. Use level:ref=* for the human readable signage used to identify physical levels (eg elevator buttons, multistory parkade levels).

I take that to mean you should not use `layer=n+1` when there are no `layer=n`.

This is not a criticism or a complaint, just a question purely out of curiosity: how did know this alignment is correct / more correct than the old one?

Underground, you can't use GPS or aerial imagery, and you probably can't even dead reckon because there are no points of reference in a dark tunnel.

1. > The government websites include "Yau Ma Tei" https://www.info.gov.hk/tb_chest/tb-chi/contents/c614_1July2007.htm https://www.dh.gov.hk/english/tele/tele_chc/tele_chc_shcf.html https://www.dh.gov.hk/english/tele/tele_chc/tele_chc_shcm.html

I think we can simply believe in the website. Quoting you from note/3209599, "I don't think you need a survey for this. If the (official!) website contains wrong data then it's entirely their problem and we have no obligation to help them clean it up."

2. Understandable. But then, `=clinic` is an obviously wrong tagging, and with how few people are seemingly interested in this topic, I don't think you can ever find an obvious and uncontested replacement without more attention. Maybe post on the forum?