Good and accurate mapping. Keep up the mapping, cheers!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149076998

Good and accurate mapping. Keep up the mapping, cheers!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149077584

Good and accurate mapping. Keep up the mapping, cheers!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149077647

Good and accurate mapping. Keep up the mapping, cheers!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149078870

Good mapping, Thanks fot the contribution.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150603005

Thanks for your contribution, Well done and keep up the mapping, cheers!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150407821

Thanks for your contribution. Keep up the mapping!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150618689

Great mapping, thanks for your contribution. Hopefully, next you can add your activity before uploading the data. Keep up the mapping, cheers!!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150618763

Great Mapping, Thanks for your contribution. Next please provide a brief comment before uploading any data on your task. Keep up the mapping, cheers!!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150623872

Great work on your mapping. Keep it up, cheers!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150702581

Great work on your mapping. Keep it up the cheers!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150706133

Great work on your changeset. Keep up the mapping, cheers!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150706314

Thanks for mapping and keep it up #OMGuru
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151744580

Great work on your mapping. Before uploading all data make sure the building has been squared could be better. Keep up the mapping, cheers! #OMGuru
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151017524

Thank you for adding specific tags. Keep up the mapping, cheers! #OMGuru #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151747397

If any accurate information is in your pocket, please add supporting tagging as
amenity=* (amenity=*)
name=* (if any)
and don't forget to add
source=* (source=*)
to verify and assist future editors who may wish to understand the origins of the data they are modifying.
Happy mapping!

Interesting discussions here! Additionally, you can avoid duplicate building on your editing by checking the data validator preference in your JOSM. So your JOSM will detect duplicate building's warning before you upload your data in JOSM.
OR
if you edit OSM Data from ID Editor, make sure you zoom in on the object to ensure the data hasn't been mapped already and avoid duplicate building. Have a great day and Happy mapping!!!

this discussion are interesting! In additionally, for more detail tagging information about the type of landuse either it's an island, coastline or wetland you can reach the wiki map features (place=island) and compare to (osm.wiki/Coastline) and (natural=wetland)

May this help you identify the most suitable tagging for this issue. Thank you and happy mapping

Hello JachymTolar your editing looks awesome. Thank you for contributing to adding data to OSM!

I want to clarify the highway classification that you added to this task is mostly Unclassified. If you can see in (highway=unclassified) this tagging tells linking villages and hamlets. Unclassified are minor roads of a lower classification than tertiary, but which serve a purpose other than access to properties. Don't use highway=unclassified just because you don't know what road type it is. The value unclassified is indeed a classification, meaning 'very minor road'. (This can be confusing, but at this point it is not feasible to change the meaning of the tag in OSM)
Thank you and keep up the mapping. Cheers!

Thank you for clarifying this further dear gscholz.
It appears that I removed a part of the wall barrier because I confirmed that it did not exist in any imagery and the location is in the middle of the forest. (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/6385790) I had no idea it was a multirelation. Could you kindly tell me how you detect this? so that I can learn and improve my edits in the future.

Thank you for clarifying this once again. Please do not hesitate to ask questions or share any information with me. It would means a lot to me. Cheers!