Since there is no response I have reverted it in changeset/150821257

Hi, thanks for contributing to bike lanes on OSM! I noticed that this change draws the Alemany Blvd bike lane as a separate way in OSM. Typically we would only add a separate way if the bike lane pavement is discontiguous. The wiki has some more details: cycleway=*#Cycle_tracks

If you agree, could you revert this change? Thanks! Kevin

Fix the type of auxiliary buildings & add contact information

I've reverted this change in changeset/128543840

Hi Ruben,

This wastewater clarifier is currently a very thin building=yes. I'm planning to make it natural=water + water=wastewater based on the guidance in: water=wastewater

Please let me know if you have any concerns.
Thanks!

Kevin

Hi Maria, this is to follow the current guidance for constructed reservoirs. man_made=reservoir_covered

thank you for fixing this!

Hi toojue,

Thanks for highlighting this dangerous intersection. There is a crosswalk here though, so pedestrian access is allowed. In OpenStreetMap, we need to tag the map based on the physical features of the world rather than adding our opinions to the map.

Thanks
Kevin

Hi toojue,

Thanks for updating the access on Guadalupe Canyon Pkwy. I agree it's not suitable for pedestrians.

However, by adding access=no, this also disallows bicycles. I have changed this to foot=no, bicycle=yes.

Thanks
Kevin

Hi D3athRIot69,

Thanks for improving the map. I have changed the natural=grassland back to landuse=grass. natural=grassland is typically used in undeveloped areas. Here is a page with more details natural=grassland?uselang=en

thanks
Kevin
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114158479

Hi Ethan,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for updating these rail features! This is a large change that updated many features over a wide area. Would you mind splitting the changes into smaller ones in the future?

Thanks
Kevin
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114159165