I was looking over the OSM wiki on Demolished Railways, and see that this may be correct usage of the `razed` tag, although there seems to be some dispute about the use of such a tag, and assuming that there was indeed a tram here at one point.

In any case, I'm ok leaving the tag, if there are no objections from other editors.

I mistakenly failed up update the source tag on this changeset. It should be "Survey".

No worries. Thanks for contributing to OSM!

Just a quick heads up: A single address should not be duplicated on multiple nodes our building outlines. One address should only appear one time. Josm gives errors if you try to have the same address on multiple objects, and I'm surprised that iD doesn't.

This changeset added a couple of addresses to multiple objects (building outline, and entrances). I've fixed it, but wanted to explain what the issue was.

As this tram does not exist, I would like to remove the tag from this roadway. Have you gotten the results from this test yet?

I forgot to change the changeset's source tag to "Survey".

I see that DENelson83 has made some more significant restructuring of the named parts of Burrard Inlet with the changeset: relation/13828327

This uses parent relations to create a complex structure, with no advantage. The fundamental issue with these changes is that there is no "one point, one name" rule. As has been pointed out in the help article and the above comment.

As per the discussion on:

https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/83528/can-different-named-areas-of-sea-overlap

there is no such rule as the one point, one name rule. I think it would be wise to stop making these major edits changing the boundaries of bays and other bodies of water, to fit your personal rules.

I've posted my question to https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/83528/

Feel free to comment there, if you would like.

Sorry, but it really does not make sense to me, to use the land parcels for the landuse traces, w/o reliable data on what the land parcels actually are. Satellite imagery is just insufficient to determine land parcels.

Based on this article: https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/city-of-burnaby-mountain-sfu-gondola-route-selection-official

The route as mapped is accurate, and now approved.

Oh, it's just a personal rule you use for yourself, not a general OSM one? I think it should have more general acceptance to change the names of bodies of water like you have with this changeset.

I'm not familiar with the "one point, one name rule for bodies of seawater". Where can I read more about it?

This one too: changeset/116266434

And some more made before and after that changeset.

Here's the changeset that fixes it: changeset/116163215

Thanks for noticing and telling me Joel. I'm not sure how I managed to do that! I reverted this changeset, and manually redid the (very minor) changes this edit originally intended. I think this is sorted the problem, but let me know if I've missed anything.

Good job on the outline, seeing as there's no imagery yet! I walked by the other day, and was surprised to see it so well done so soon after construction finished.

Oops, the source tag should read `Survey`.

Thanks for making the tagging of this construction area more detailed. I am wondering if the `level`, `layer`, and `underground` tags. As the construction continues right to the surface, I feel that it would be more accurate with these tags removed from the station construction sites.

What do you think 3ngineer?

Uhh... Was it the art gallery?