kechan's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 129692310 | I didn't add them. It says version one due to my method of aligning roads where I would delete the road except for two nodes and redraw it. I think they came from a user named "RGoldfinger." As for if they are needed or not, I think some of them are necessary with correct tagging (e.g. no capitals and underscores). However, I have no idea what some of these are trying to say such as "_EMP__=1.2000" and I feel that they could be removed |
|
| 138000942 | i added a road too |
|
| 136520908 | the names came from public gis data, forgot to put that in the source |
|
| 136500424 | Congrats on ten thousand changesets! |
|
| 124702061 | When I made this, I thought of it as an "Easter Egg." THIS IS VANDALISM!!!!! I feel so bad for ever making this changeset. I only ever think about this with regret and won't do this again. |
|
| 125382574 | added farmland |
|
| 134960415 | Thank You! |
|
| 134595891 | forgot i was logged in to rapid |
|
| 134670309 | I could have updated them to place=neighbourhood, but there is already a node with that tag in both |
|
| 130015730 | Thanks for fixing! I will say that when I made that changeset my biggest concern was splitting the road and I did not pay attention to the direction the road was going. I will be more careful about this from now on. |
|
| 134517105 | and roads |
|
| 133094516 | I made this a trunk road. I admit it also works as a primary road. Where is the discussion you are talking about? I want to see what people said about my edit. |
|
| 56141 | First viewable relation |
|
| 132852576 | The building was removed? I think Go Map overrid the building=yes tag. I will add the building=riding_hall tag to the way. |
|
| 132941262 | 1000th edit! Congrats |
|
| 132800314 | "clay" is a typo because JOSM was filling in tags and I wasn't paying very close attention to what I was putting in. |
|
| 131672363 | wrong account |
|
| 131673042 | It does seem that the a new building has been built over the burnt one.
|
|
| 131204925 | I am suspicious of this name being associated with the homeowners. |
|
| 130990894 | I often try to get close to the situation and assess it from there, but I saw how close all the examples were to each other, maybe one edit could do. I also changed the email associated with this account to my main one. |