katpatuka's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 91732299 | Hopefully correct ;) I would have to walk there with a GPS device for a controlling survey... :) By the way: Maxar Imagery is a bit newer than Bing Imagery; they also differ in an offset... |
|
| 91872644 | The status of being a National Park has unfortunately been removed by the government to be replaced by a so-called Kapadokya Alan (relation/9986530) but since the area is still listed in several wikipedias the area hasn't been removed (see https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Göreme_Tarihî_Millî_Parkı and discussion on https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tartışma:Göreme_Tarihî_Millî_Parkı - in Turkish) :/ |
|
| 91872644 | Looks ok so far; I've just changed way-type to residential and one way was crossing over a building which I've fixed too ;) |
|
| 46597949 | Ok - but you don't need to notify me if you change single nodes... ;) Nonetheless I had a controlling look and noticed a crossing waterway section of way way/478648001 with your way near node node/668101314 which I've fixed. |
|
| 46631242 | Good :) 3 years ago there was no Maxar Premium imagery available... |
|
| 3710676 | No need to notify me but thank you ;) |
|
| 46587826 | Thank you ;) Back in 2017 there was no maxar imagery yet and imagery wasn't very good in North Vietnam as far as I can remember... |
|
| 86461212 | Ha! Tamam! josm'de sadece en son 2019'un uydu görüntüsü bulunuyor... |
|
| 86461212 | Ilısu Baraj Gölü hemen doldu mu? Allah allah! Kanıtlayabilen uydu görüntüsü göremedim ama... ;) O zaman su altında kalan köyleri hemen taşınması gerekecek: Kaşüstü, Balıklı, Kelekçi, Çattepe vb... |
|
| 46144769 | If you've got some spare time could you eventually refine your 3-year old rough outlined ways in Pingle County and Lipu City using maxar Premium imagery? |
|
| 65332189 | It seemingly has no influence anyway as one sees on the standard layer where it gets mixed; the humanitarian layer shows water over heath ;) |
|
| 65332189 | There also exists relation/9396582 as 'heath' which partly overlays the dry lake - I guess I'd chosen to add layer=-1 to let the heath render above the lake. I've never been there therefore I cannot tell anything about the on-ground reality ;) |
|
| 54402427 | So what shall we do with this multipolygon?!? |
|
| 88811536 | Razed is possible too, but I don't know the exactly when to use what. Additionally I've never been there ;) Abandoned means that the iron rail track is still visible but one never sees a train passing there. Feel free to change it :) |
|
| 74390292 | I see ;) - one could then maybe rather tag it "proposed:landuse=industrial" (see proposed=* ) |
|
| 74390292 | hm - using maxar imagery the area looks rather 'natural' than 'industrial' - can you confirm that it is really industrial or is it 'planned' to become industrial ? |
|
| 84466531 | Deyuan (relation/9637961 ) isn't a closed area anymore - can you fix it? |
|
| 86614942 | sağol ;) |
|
| 85320117 | If this "longmen_radii" relation is not needed anymore I'd suggest to delete it together with its members ;) |
|
| 83995683 | Don't you think mountain_range is more correct for 龙泉山脉 ? The area is not all wood or forest so should IMHO not be rendered all over in green... |