Bitte Rollen berichtigen: relation/15724817

Der Relationstyp multipolygon dient der Kartierung von Flächen, die nicht als einfaches Polygon (=geschlossener Ring) dargetellt werden können, sondern dafür mehrere Polygone benötigen. Die Zusammenfassung von einzelnen Mauerabschnitten ist kein Multipolygon.

Verschobene Knoten revertiert: changeset/135056188

That cannot be correct:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-76.14487&lat=46.39479&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Ist die Datenlizenz für die Verwendung in OSM inzwischen geklärt? Siehe https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/datenlizenz-deutschland-rheinland-pfalz/74775

Davon abgesehen boundary=protected_area => Relation type=boundary

Rollen überprüfen!

Please ccheck and fix https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-74.56316&lat=45.02945&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Please check and fix https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-78.70900&lat=52.64988&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Warum legst Du hier eine völlg neue Relation https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/15411840 an wo doch schon eine https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/2511819 existiert? Anstatt die bestehende schrittweise zu löschen und durch die neue zu ersetzen und damit die ursprüngliche Historie zu tilgen, solltet Du besser die bestehende Relation weiterentwickeln.

bittte etwas mehr Sorgfalt: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=6.84422&lat=50.47781&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=intersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cways

One feature - oneOSM object (osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element):
cycleway way/1149145825#map=17/46.98683/6.91676 and way/1149145824#map=16/46.9850/6.9129 already exist tagged as cycleway=lane on primary highway. Please adjust.

Aber nicht in der von mir verlinkten relation/15489316. Siehe auch Versionshistorie:
https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/15489316

Aber was hat das mit einer Grenze (type=boundary) zu tun?

Was willt Du mit dieser Relation darstellen: relation/15489316 ?

Was willt Du damit bezwecken, eine existierende (https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/1741732) Relation nochmal anzulegen (https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/15426866) und die alte zu verstümmeln: relation/1741732#map=16/48.8181/15.2644

Multipolygon nur aus inner?

Was soll das werden?
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=11.61157&lat=52.12502&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

correct location:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-57.95788&lat=49.65619&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Please fix broken multipolygon:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-56.84105&lat=50.03577&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Please fix broken multipolygon:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-56.84105&lat=50.03577&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Was denn nun, scrub oder wetland?
Bitte korrigieren: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=9.38682&lat=48.94052&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways