jtracey's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 138599254 | Are these features actually under construction currently, or are they merely proposed? |
|
| 141834313 | Are these features actually under construction currently, or are they merely proposed? |
|
| 141839653 | Reverts changeset/141834154 |
|
| 141834154 | As has been explained to you before, this is not how things are mapped in OSM. You cannot map things that are not under construction as construction. If you're not going to engage with the OSM community, you're just going to get blocked (again). I'm reverting this edit, and now have to go through your other edits to see what other damage you have done. Next edit I see like this, I'm reporting you to the DWG. |
|
| 140911710 | Resolves:
|
|
| 140911569 | Resolves note/3853631 |
|
| 140911383 | Resolves note/3844911 |
|
| 140911259 | Resolves the following notes:
|
|
| 140910918 | Resolves note/3854715 |
|
| 140833076 | Resolves note/3871967 |
|
| 140832883 | Resolves note/3867965 |
|
| 140593281 | Resolves note/3861123 |
|
| 140254975 | resolves note/3846781 |
|
| 140151292 | Ahh yes, this is a known problem, see https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/2025 and https://media.jochentopf.com/media/2022-08-15-study-evolution-of-the-osm-data-model.pdf for more context (tl;dr: there's no solution for now, the planned new API revision might be a good time to change it). However, including any kind of non-readable data in tags isn't allowed, so as clever as it is, I'd say next time just note it in a fixme tag or something ;) |
|
| 140151292 | What is 'opening_hours:gzip'? |
|
| 140142415 | resolves note/3843082 and note/3843088 |
|
| 140142252 | resolves note/3843068 |
|
| 140139299 | Resolves note/3843065 |
|
| 140139191 | Resolves note/3843060 and note/3843061 |
|
| 140096415 | fixes note/3839677 |