Porque es la importancia relativa de acuerdo a lo que considera la población local, los organismos oficiales y a la vez es compatible con la definiciones dadas por la wiki.

¿Cuál es esa razón de importancia para cambiar tantos tertiary a unclassified?

Esta es la señalética propia de una autopista chilena que no se ve otros caminos diferente de "motorway": https://sp.depositphotos.com/110134970/stock-photo-motorway-information-signs-in-chile.html

En Chile se utiliza highway=motorway para aquellos caminos de doble calzada que poseen estándares de autopista de acuerdo a la legislación chilena, satisfaciendo de esta forma los requerimientos de la etiqueta.

Me parece que los campamentos que creaste no son áreas de acampar.

Yes, before my changeset the park was a polygon. Then, I have converted some polygons to a relation. But really I'm not the creator.

Hello. I don't know either. Probably it doesn't exist. Some state parks was converted from leisure=park to leisure=nature_reserve. The first is commonly used in urban parks and the second for natural protected areas.
Regards.

I'm agree with naoliv. We should talk with the author of this relation and export the data to an umap.

Por favor usar mayúsculas sólo cuando corresponda y no crear sitios que ya existen.

Maybe is more easy send an email with the petition about updating the ocean polygon in these map stylings.

De acuerdo a la información que manejo el Nevado Chachacomani se encuentra cerca del Condoriri y que era correcto el nombre que puse de ex glaciar Chacaltaya.

Hola, algunos de los glaciares que mapeaste en esta zona no existen si observas imágenes libres de nieve.

Hello! In this case these bays are parts of the ocean (the larger waterbody that you mean). But, apparently the map styling that you show me doesn't updating the ocean polygon (the ocean is procesed separatley as a huge (multi)polygon). I believe some map styling only update the ocean polygon once in the year. Only solution that I can see for the render is the replacement of natural=bay by natural=water over the ocean (note that natural=coastline should be placed in the top of the tidal range).
Regards.

Hola, me parece que la única línea de base recta en Venezuela es la cierra el delta del Orinoco según aparece acá: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/61601.pdf
Y este sería el mar territorial de Venezuela según recopilación de diferentes fuentes: http://www.marineregions.org/eezdetails.php?mrgid=8433&all_territories=1&zone=eez_12nm
Saludos.

Of course, is interesting to differentiate the type of a coastline. Unfortunately there are no a tag for this purpose yet. The tag natural=coastline is only used to mark mean high water spring and it doesn't capable to differentiate the type of seawater. We can create a new tag based on your ground observations.

Definition of the natural=coastline is independent of locally established divisions. boundary=* tag supplies the second purpose. Your point view is incompatible with the OSM basic principle "Map what's on the ground".

But technically the wiki doesn't prohibit the usage of waterway=riverbank into the sea. Then, if the sources doesn't convince you, we can use both tagging: natural=coastline & waterway=riverbank + tidal=yes

Furthermore, note that in the description of natural=bay you can read the next text: "The edge of a bay towards land should coincide with the coastline" in the section 'how to map'.

According the description of natural=coastline it should be placed exactly in the mean high water spring i.e. IMO more or less here: osm.org/#map=15/-33.9765/151.0237
Is better to solve the "conflict" consulting the different sources about this topic.
Check the concept of "ria": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ria
Article of Botany Bay is also usefull that cite a paper about the marine condition of the bay: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botany_Bay
We can review different sources about the topic to decide the best placement of natural=coastline. In the mailing list somebody posted this paper that show us a clearly sea water dominant in the estuary: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.575.3453&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Regards.

You're wrong, all renders support natural=bay. This is the approved tag by the community for mapping a bay area. Here you can see an example of a successful rendering: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/nOQ
Obviously, to obtain a correct render, the polygon should be inside a water polygon or in the ocean. In the past you tagging it as natural=bay, but you remove natural=coastline also. natural=coastline should not been removed from maritime waters. This is the reason of a deficient rendering. More info here: natural=bay#How_to_map