Hello Idkwhattoputhere,
thanks for contributing and supporting this project by your mapping.
In this project I came across area of "landuse=forest" here. Even though the chosen tag is correct, it is more likely that it just "natural=wood" - meaning no active utilisation takes place. Anyways I can not recommend to map features like this in projects like this one. The reason is that you are requested to stay with your mapping within the area of the task. Very often it happens that landuses go far beyond the task area. The result of mapping these features is an odd shaped area - and as it is usually not the task to map these features the neighbor contributor does not continue mapping the area. Therefore I cannot recommend mapping these features within these projects.
Anyway, keep on mapping and contributing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142004456

Hello Edwright,
thanks for contributing to the project in Brazil.
You requested to get a fewback on your edit - here you go.
You mapped quite a few objects here and assigned to all of them the building=yes property - some of the "buildings" you added are very tiny and actually not buildings at all, but cars or other objects along the street. It needs some practise and imagination to intepret the aerial imagery - so keep on practising. Also take care that the buildings you add are mapped with a rectangular shape (hit "q"-key in the editor). Here is a visualization of your edit: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141981833/
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141981833

Hi Stephanietachon,
as you have requested to get a feedback on your edit, here it is from my side. You assigned a name to a building. For me it looked also odd. I think your actual intention was to state that the building has a recangular shape. In OSM this is done by correcting the geometry of objects, but not with "name=Rectangular Building". I have fixed this now. Anyways, keep on mapping.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142116256

Hello Shishir Teja,
I kindly ask you not to map trees in a closed forest. This tag is meant for isolated and distinguishable trees, e.g. to map trees on a open landscape, e.g. farmland, meadows (see also Wiki here: natural=tree)
In this case and to save your contribution I have included your tree nodes into a new area of "natural=wood" - but it would have been better if you had sticked to the instructions of the project (buildings, highways, waterways).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141910789

Hello Nadine Devich,
thanks for contributing to this humanitarian project in Brazil.
It seems that you mapped far beyond the task limits and even outside of the project area. When working for these kind of projects it is really important to stay within the assigned area. The main reason is that only the mappings inside the boarders will be checked by more experienced mappers during validation - in this case I came more or less randomly across your edits ...
You added several building contures. Please ensure that you square the buildings you add - simply press "q"-key in the editor when the object is selected.
I am just fixing the issues with the building now.
You are very welcome to continue mapping and contributing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143178348

Hello Kern88!, thanks for contributing to OSM and the humanitarian project in Brazil. You requested to get a feedback - so here it is.
You have requested to get a feedback on your mapping - here it is:
You mapped building contures here. Almost all of them were mapped with right angles, very good.
One thing you should avoid is to assign specific tags like "building=house". Hopefully I am right (else please feel free to reply): as I think you are not a local mapper who knows the locality very well, it is recommended to use the generic tag "building=yes" instead. This leaves the decision about the actual building-type to the local community.
Keep on mapping and supporting OSM.
You can get a visualization of your changeset here:
https://osmcha.org/changesets/141890451/
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141890451

Hello Angelina Reish,
thanks for contributing to OSM and the humanitarian project in Brasil.
You have requested to get a feedback on your mapping - here it is:
You mapped building contures here and assigned the tag "building=house". If you are a local mapped perfect - if not it is recommended to use the generic tag "building=yes" instead. This leaves the decision about the actual building-type to the local community.
Another thing you might try to improve is to square the buildings you add. In the editor just press "q"-key when the object is selected.
I know this was your only edit so far - though I hope that you you return one day contributing again.
Here you can see a visualization of your changeset https://osmcha.org/changesets/142106437/
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142106437

Hello dumbinom,
thanks for contributing and supporting this project by your mapping.
You mapped and area of "natural=grassland here. Even though the chosen tag could be correct, I can not recommend to map features like this in projects like this one. The reason is that you are requested to stay with your mapping within the area of the task. In case of landuses that go beyond the task area the result of mapping these is that an odd shaped area results - and as it is usually not the task to map these features the neighbor contributor does not continue mapping the area. Therefore I cannot recommend mapping these features within these projects.
I am doing currently a kind of 3rd pass validation for the project - I have decided to remove the area as there is not certainty about the actual type of landuse (could e.g. also be a meadow).
Anyways, keep on mapping.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142004945

Hello Sperberber,
thanks for contributing and supporting this project by your mapping.
You mapped and area of "natural=grassland here. Even though the chosen tag could be correct, I can not recommend to map features like this in projects like this one. The reason is that you are requested to stay with your mapping within the area of the task. In case of landuses that go beyond the task area the result of mapping these is that an odd shaped area results - and as it is usually not the task to map these features the neighbor contributor does not continue mapping the area. Therefore I cannot recommend mapping these features within these projects.
As there have been already complaints of the local Brazilian community about the mapping quality of this project (I am doing currently a kind of 3rd pass validation) I have decided to remove the area as there is not certainty about the actual type of landuse (could e.g. also be a meadow). Thanks for your understanding.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143104402

Hello mayais11,
thanks for contributing and supporting this project by your mapping.
Here you mapped and area of "natural=wood" here. Even though the chosen tag is totally correct, I can not recommend to map features like this in projects like this one. The reason is that you are requested to stay with your mapping within the area of the task. In case of landuses that go beyond the task area the result of mapping these is that an odd shaped area results - and as it is usually not the task to map these features the neighbor contributor does not continue mapping the area. Therefore I cannot recommend mapping these features within these projects.
Anyway, keep on mapping and contributing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142109139

Hello RockhopperMapper, you asked to get a review on your edits in this changeset.
What I liked was that you sucessfully squared buildings mapped by other mappers - always good to do so. What I do not recommend is to map landuses in this kind of projects. The main reason is that you are requested to stay with your mapping within the area of the task. In case of landuses that go beyond the task area the result of mapping these is that an odd shaped area results - and as it is usually not the task to map these features the neighbor contributor does not continue mapping the area. Therefore I cannot recommend mapping these features within these projects.
Anyways keep on mapping!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142139783

Hello Shishir Teja,
working on this humanitarian project in Brasil which focussed on the mapping of highways, buildings and waterways, you added nodes of natural=tree here. This tag is meant to mark positions of individual trees, but at this position is an area (=closed way) that might be tagged as natural=wood. If trees form a line in parallel to a road you might also use "natural=tree_row", but natural=tree is not the right tag here.
FYI: I have removed most of the nodes and have included some of the nodes in two new tree_rows.
In general for projects with explicit instructions like this one I would ask you to stick to the instructions and avoid to add other features. The task is to check task's for the requested features. If nothing all requested features are mapped then just check "mapped".
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141911280

Hello Hannahtheegg,
thanks for contributing to this humanitarian OSM project in Brasil. You added an area of landuse=farmland here (way/1212503074). Although on the task's imagery from BING it looks like you are right in fact it is false as visible on other imagery (ESRI). It is a residential area and buildings have been built here in the meanwhile. I have removed this area therefore. As mapping landuses was not the focus of this project I kindly ask you to stick to what is written in the instructions.
Anyways, keep on mapping!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142036929

Olá Daniel, muito obrigado por sua ajuda com este projeto. Você pediu um feedback sobre sua contribuição. Certifique-se de que os edifícios que você desenhou sejam retangulares. Para fazer isso, basta pressionar o botão q no editor quando o objeto estiver selecionado. Outro ponto: você selecionou "building=house" como o tipo de edifício. Essa é uma tag específica. Não tenho certeza se você tem conhecimento local. Você pode enviar um breve feedback. Se estiver contribuindo remotamente, é melhor usar apenas a tag "building=yes" e deixar a especificação mais detalhada para os mapeadores locais mais tarde.
Você pode ver uma visualização de sua contribuição aqui: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141891096
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141891096

Hello Becca A, at first thanks for contributing for the humanitarian project in Brasil.
You assigned "building=house" to quite a few buildings you added. Unlike having local knowledge ( I think you are remote mapping) - e.g. inhabitent of the region / city, it is recommended to assign the simple and more generic "building=yes". Decision about the actual building-type can then be left to check by the local community. Also remember to square the buildings you add - simple hit "q"-key in the editor when the object is selected.
Keep on mapping and supporting OSM.
P.S. Here is a nice visualization of this changeset https://osmcha.org/changesets/141959112/
I fixed the issued in the meanwhile - so all only kind guidance for future mapping.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141959112

Hello Marco, just came across another thing. You added isolated nodes and assigned the tag "natural=wood". This tag is normally used for areas covered by trees. For isolated nodes use natural=tree instead to individual trees.

Hello Taylor_k14,
thanks for contributing to OSM in this humanitarian project.
You requested a feedback on your changeset.
You added building contures here. You used the right tag "building=yes" - if you had local knowledge you could also use more specific tags - but I think you were mapping remotely. When adding building contures, please remember to square these to achieve right angled corner - simply select the object and hit the "q"-key. Also you decided to add swimming pool. Instead of "natural=water" the appropriate tag is "leisure=swimming_pool.
Keep on mapping and contributing!
P.S. a visualization of your changeset is here: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141932243/
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141932243

Hello ElifCvk,
thanks for contributing to this humanitarian project in Brazil. You have requested to get a feedback on your mapping - here it is:
You mapped building contures here and assigned the tag "building=house" or building="industrial". As I think you are not a local mapper who knows the locality very well, it is recommended to use the generic tag "building=yes" instead. This leaves the decision about the actual building-type to the local community.
Furthermore most buildings in reality have right angled corners - please remember to square them: In the editor just press "q"-key when the object is selected. Also in some of your changesets there were overlappings of building contures, please try to avoid this by zooming in and mapping precisely.
Keep on mapping and supporting OSM.
You can get a visualization of your changeset here:
https://osmcha.org/changesets/141915744/
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141915744

Hello siposgr7007,
thanks for contributing to this project in Brasil and welcome to OSM. You assigned "building=house" to most of the buildings you added here. Unlike having local knowledge ( I think you are remote mapping) - e.g. inhabitent of the region / city, it is recommended to assign the simple and more generic "building=yes". Decision about the actual building-type can then be left to check by the local community.
Keep on mapping and supporting OSM.

Hello Elliot05,
thanks for contributing to this humanitarian project in Brazil. You have requested to get a feedback on your mapping - here it is:
You mapped building contures here and assigned the tag "building=house". As I think you are not a local mapper who knows the locality very well, it is recommended to use the generic tag "building=yes" instead. This leaves the decision about the actual building-type to the local community.
Furthermore try to square the buildings you add (meaning 90° angles at the corners. In the editor just press "q"-key when the object is selected.
Keep on mapping and supporting OSM.
You can review your changeset here:
https://osmcha.org/changesets/141932632/
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141932632