Olá Daniel, muito obrigado por sua ajuda com este projeto. Você pediu um feedback sobre sua contribuição. Certifique-se de que os edifícios que você desenhou sejam retangulares. Para fazer isso, basta pressionar o botão q no editor quando o objeto estiver selecionado. Outro ponto: você selecionou "building=house" como o tipo de edifício. Essa é uma tag específica. Não tenho certeza se você tem conhecimento local. Você pode enviar um breve feedback. Se estiver contribuindo remotamente, é melhor usar apenas a tag "building=yes" e deixar a especificação mais detalhada para os mapeadores locais mais tarde.
Você pode ver uma visualização de sua contribuição aqui: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141891096
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141891096

Hello Becca A, at first thanks for contributing for the humanitarian project in Brasil.
You assigned "building=house" to quite a few buildings you added. Unlike having local knowledge ( I think you are remote mapping) - e.g. inhabitent of the region / city, it is recommended to assign the simple and more generic "building=yes". Decision about the actual building-type can then be left to check by the local community. Also remember to square the buildings you add - simple hit "q"-key in the editor when the object is selected.
Keep on mapping and supporting OSM.
P.S. Here is a nice visualization of this changeset https://osmcha.org/changesets/141959112/
I fixed the issued in the meanwhile - so all only kind guidance for future mapping.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141959112

Hello Marco, just came across another thing. You added isolated nodes and assigned the tag "natural=wood". This tag is normally used for areas covered by trees. For isolated nodes use natural=tree instead to individual trees.

Hello Taylor_k14,
thanks for contributing to OSM in this humanitarian project.
You requested a feedback on your changeset.
You added building contures here. You used the right tag "building=yes" - if you had local knowledge you could also use more specific tags - but I think you were mapping remotely. When adding building contures, please remember to square these to achieve right angled corner - simply select the object and hit the "q"-key. Also you decided to add swimming pool. Instead of "natural=water" the appropriate tag is "leisure=swimming_pool.
Keep on mapping and contributing!
P.S. a visualization of your changeset is here: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141932243/
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141932243

Hello ElifCvk,
thanks for contributing to this humanitarian project in Brazil. You have requested to get a feedback on your mapping - here it is:
You mapped building contures here and assigned the tag "building=house" or building="industrial". As I think you are not a local mapper who knows the locality very well, it is recommended to use the generic tag "building=yes" instead. This leaves the decision about the actual building-type to the local community.
Furthermore most buildings in reality have right angled corners - please remember to square them: In the editor just press "q"-key when the object is selected. Also in some of your changesets there were overlappings of building contures, please try to avoid this by zooming in and mapping precisely.
Keep on mapping and supporting OSM.
You can get a visualization of your changeset here:
https://osmcha.org/changesets/141915744/
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141915744

Hello siposgr7007,
thanks for contributing to this project in Brasil and welcome to OSM. You assigned "building=house" to most of the buildings you added here. Unlike having local knowledge ( I think you are remote mapping) - e.g. inhabitent of the region / city, it is recommended to assign the simple and more generic "building=yes". Decision about the actual building-type can then be left to check by the local community.
Keep on mapping and supporting OSM.

Hello Elliot05,
thanks for contributing to this humanitarian project in Brazil. You have requested to get a feedback on your mapping - here it is:
You mapped building contures here and assigned the tag "building=house". As I think you are not a local mapper who knows the locality very well, it is recommended to use the generic tag "building=yes" instead. This leaves the decision about the actual building-type to the local community.
Furthermore try to square the buildings you add (meaning 90° angles at the corners. In the editor just press "q"-key when the object is selected.
Keep on mapping and supporting OSM.
You can review your changeset here:
https://osmcha.org/changesets/141932632/
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141932632

Hello Marco1990,
thanks for contributing to this project in Brasil. You assigned "building=house" to most of the buildings you added here. Unlike having local knowledge ( I think you are remote mapping) - e.g. inhabitent of the region / city, it is recommended to assign the simple and more generic "building=yes". Decision about the actual building-type can then be left to check by the local community.
Keep on mapping and supporting OSM.

Hello Chaitanya Shetty,
thanks for contributing to this project in Brasil. You assigned "building=house" to most of the buildings you added here. Unlike having local knowledge ( I think you are remote mapping) - e.g. inhabitent of the region / city, it is recommended to assign the simple and more generic "building=yes". Decision about the actual building-type can then be left to check by the local community.
Keep on mapping and supporting OSM.

Hola Fiorella Lopez
bienvenida a OSM. Acabo de notar que usted ha solicitado una opinión sobre este conjunto de cambios.
Aquí está mi opinión.
En primer lugar gracias por contribuir al proyecto de inundaciones. Has mapeado contornos de edificios aquí. Usted seleccionó "building=house" para el tipo. Como creo que en realidad no es un mapeador local de la ciudad en la que contribuyó, se recomienda utilizar la etiqueta genérica "building=yes", pero no etiquetas específicas a menos que esté absolutamente seguro de ello (principio de la verdad sobre el terreno). Recuerda también cuadrar los edificios que añadas - en el editor sólo tienes que pulsar la tecla "q" cuando el objeto esté seleccionado en el editor.
Sigue mapeando.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141934747

Hello Fiorella Lopez,
welcome to OSM. I just noticed that you have requested a feedback on this changeset.
Here is my feedback.
At first thanks for contributing to the flooding project. You mapped building contures here. You selected "building=house" for the type. As I think you actually not a local mapper of the city where you contributed, it is recommended to use the generic tag "building=yes", but not specific tags unlike you are absolutely sure about it (principle of ground truth). Also remember to square the buildings you add - in the editor just press the "q" key when the object is selected in the editor.
Keep on mapping.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141934747

Hello Idkwhattoputhere,
welcome to OSM;
while uploading your edits you checked the box to as for a feedback. You can easily see a visualisation of your edits here: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142003770/.
Here's my feedback:
You added a highway as "highway=footway" here. The tag "footway" in OSM has a very specific meaning, implying that only pedestrians are allowed to use this way. While remote mapping it is better to use general tag. In this case a "highway=service" and "service=driveway" would be the right choice. Also do not connect highways to building contures - and remember that buildings have normally right angled corners - press "q" key in the editor when the object is selected.
Keep on mapping.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142003770

slightly corrected course of way #551271869 referring to data from Strava Heatmap; repositioned / resized / split building contures; corrected highway classifications (e.g. service instead of unclassified) applied different offsets to imagery (BING):
-8.21; -2.84
-7.76; -2.39
-9.26; 0.15

additional info: checked about 100 objects that were created in the HOT project. Used project's imagery BING as primary imagery (compared regularly with ESRI / Mapbox); applied different offsets to BING imagery taken into account the former mapping of highways:
-9.41; -1.94
-1.49; 1.05
-8.36; -4.03

FYI: as I am validating this HOT project, I have just scanned the area for the tag "demolished:building" and have changed the tagging of the few objects found into "destroyed=buildings" instead.

Hello Nordseeküstenradweg,
you have modified the tagging of several objects in the city of Acapulco from "destroyed:building" into "demolished:building". The chosen tagging using "destroyed:" prefix is the result of an organized mapping of HOT project 15797 related to the Hurricane "Otis" and was done in accordance with the project instructions.
Even though the tag "demolished:" is more frequently used, its meaning is different from "destroyed:". In contrast to "demolished:" with "destroyed:" there are still remains of the buildings structure on the ground which is the case here.
I want you to ask to stop modifying the tagging in this area, as this tag will be evaluated to assess the damage. It would be also nice, if you could revert your changes.
Thank you for your understanding.

Olá Fitint,
Obrigado por seu feedback.
Tomo nota das críticas ao projeto e à qualidade do mapeamento.
Os projetos da HOT (osm.wiki/Pt:Humanitarian_OSM_Team) estão focados em apoiar o gerenciamento e a prevenção de desastres naturais em todo o mundo.
Nesse caso, a inundação na cidade de Arroio do Meio (RS). Nesse caso, o "Hub de Mapeo Abierto Améroca Latina y el Caribe", com a participação da UMBRAOSM, o Hub de Mapeamento Aberto da América Latina e do Caribe, e dos capítulos brasileiros do YouthMappers, lançou um projeto para completar o mapeamento de edifícios, estradas e cursos d'água (córrego, rio), veja também https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/15602/

1) Infelizmente, normalmente só é possível descobrir a origem dos mapeadores caso a caso - por exemplo, com base no idioma definido no editor ou analisando o HeatMap do usuário, por exemplo, no meu caso https://yosmhm.neis-one.org/?jmsbert. No total, 310 pessoas participaram do projeto, trabalhando em cerca de 2.000 tarefas. De acordo com as estatísticas do projeto, 9388 edifícios foram registrados em 17592 registros de alterações e 51 km de estradas foram adicionados.

As instruções do projeto podem ser visualizadas aqui (https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/15602/tasks) - infelizmente, apenas para usuários registrados do Tasking Manager.
O objetivo era registrar edifícios, estradas e corpos d'água. Infelizmente, o texto é muito longo para ser reproduzido aqui.
Para validação: não há instruções adicionais para os validadores. A tarefa é verificar se as instruções definidas para o projeto foram cumpridas (para edifícios, por exemplo, tamanho correto, posição, formato retangular, sem sobreposições nem nós compartilhados com outros edifícios). Também é necessário verificar se há outros erros óbvios na área. As alterações feitas pelos mapeadores além das instruções não fazem parte da verificação. As correções só são feitas aqui se forem reconhecíveis erros muito óbvios. Se os mapeadores repetidamente registrarem coisas completamente diferentes das especificadas no projeto, eles serão contatados.

2) Eu mesmo não faço parte da equipe de organização deste projeto, nem sou membro do "Hub de Mapeo Abierto Améroca Latina y el Caribe". Em vez disso, faço parte da equipe do "HOT Global Validator" e, como tal, apoiei o projeto validando aproximadamente 30% do projeto geral.

A decisão sobre quais pessoas podem registrar dados e qual o nível de experiência necessário para a validação é determinada pelo organizador do projeto. Nesse meio tempo, também entrei em contato com o organizador ou com meus colegas da HOT sobre a qualidade às vezes ruim do mapeamento. Fiz o downgrade de muitas tarefas que já haviam sido liberadas se o mapeamento não estivesse OK. Eu mesmo corrigi pequenos erros. Além das imagens aéreas, também usei o mapa de calor do Strava e o OpenTopoMap como fontes para verificar as posições dos percursos das estradas, alinhar imagens de satélite e registrar a direção do fluxo e o curso dos rios.

Hello again,
having validated other tasks I came across another school area. Same here, "building=yes" was modified into "leisure=schoolyard".
Am I right that the actual situation is like this: a schoolyard covered by a roof? In case of way/1225033951 the roof got damaged by the hurricane so that the schoolyard below became visible. For me this is plausible now.
In this case I propose to use two tags: building=roof leisure=schoolyard; in case of damaged roof, the tag "destroyed:building=roof" would be used.
Do you agree?

Hola de nuevo
habiendo validado otras tareas me encontré con otra zona escolar. Lo mismo aquí, "building=yes" se modificó en "leisure=schoolyard".
¿Estoy en lo cierto al afirmar que la situación real es la siguiente: un patio de colegio cubierto por un tejado? En el caso de way/1225033951, el tejado resultó dañado por el huracán, de modo que el patio de la escuela quedó a la vista. Para mí esto ya es plausible.
En este caso propongo utilizar dos etiquetas: building=roof leisure=schoolyard; en caso de que el tejado esté dañado, se utilizaría la etiqueta "destroyed:building=roof".
¿Está de acuerdo?

Hola Alex Buenaventura, actualmente estoy validando la cartografía de los edificios afectados por el huracán. Has modificado el etiquetado de way/1225033951 de edificio=escuela a ocio=patio escolar.
He comprobado todas las imágenes disponibles (ESRI, BING, ESRI Clarity y Mapbox) - todas muestran un edificio en esta posición y las imágenes de ESRI son de hecho muy recientes con fecha del 6 de enero de 2023.
En mi opinión, se trata más bien de un pabellón deportivo destruido por el huracán.
Para continuar con el proceso de validación he decidido cambiar el etiquetado en destroyed:building=yes
Espero que le parezca bien.

Hello Alex Buenaventura, I am currently validating the mapping of buildings affected by the hurricane. You modified the tagging of way/1225033951 from building=school into leisure=schoolyard.
I have checked all available imagery (ESRI, BING, ESRI Clarity and Mapbox) - all show a building at this position and ESRI's imagery is indeed very recent dated from 6th January 2023.
For me it looks more like a sportshall that has been destroyed by the hurricane.
To continue the validation process I have decided to change the tagging into destroyed:building=yes
I hope this is OK for you.