jleedev's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 113249136 | ||
| 113248219 | Please use words in changeset descriptions. See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments for some explanation of why this is required. Thanks. |
|
| 112669978 | What is the purpose of this change? Many features were deleted: parking, landuse, corridor, barrier, hydrant. Are they all gone? It's not a good idea to delete things without an explanation. |
|
| 113241616 | Do these deleted roads not exist anymore? |
|
| 113117206 | Your office is located inside a parking garage? |
|
| 113034152 | Select the node and push X, or right click and choose Split. Also, you refer to ‘El Paso’, but way/72650873 has no name, so maybe you can add it. |
|
| 112860807 | ||
| 112421011 | ||
| 112044347 | Mass deletions like this continue to be an inappropriate way to map. |
|
| 112093729 | Mass deletions like this continue to be an inappropriate way to map. |
|
| 112099357 | Mass deletions like this continue to be an inappropriate way to map. |
|
| 111783143 | Already exists node/1371543275 |
|
| 111606392 | Generally speaking, the ‘name’ tag should almost never contain a generic description of the feature. natural=water + water=pond is sufficient. |
|
| 111606097 | Better would be highway=construction, construction=residential. |
|
| 111346851 | Hello, I have some comments: 1) I don't see the name "Hayden Run" on the USGS map, but I do see "Peggs Run". Unfortunately, the GNIS forms are offline and their list of names and citations are unavailable. Can you provide a source for the name "Hayden Run"? 2) Waterways should flow in the correct direction, following the arrows, and it should connect all the way to the Ohio River waterway centerline. 3) Try to avoid connecting waterways to features such as roads, powerlines, boundaries. |
|
| 111340593 | I suspect that the Ohio River is more than 1.6 meters wide. |
|
| 111317285 | It would appear that these roads are visible in Esri Clarity but are absent from more recent imagery including Bing, Esri, and PEMA, which suggests to me that they no longer exist. Can you explain what's going on here in more detail? |
|
| 111169210 | ||
| 110734666 | Hello, if necessary please also update the relation relation/5632798 to follow this segment. |
|
| 110478746 | Again, it would be better to use amenity=atm for these, not amenity=bank. |