Was there any particular reason that you wanted to delete separately mapped sidewalks?

Hello Tre, I would prefer if you did not delete sidewalks like this, see my comment under changeset/178516175.

Hello Tre, in this changeset you deleted many separately mapped sidewalks and applied the sidewalk=both tag to replace those sidewalks. Actually, you could have applied some variation of the sidewalk=separate tag to the roads and kept the separately mapped sidewalks - see sidewalk=*#Separately_mapped_sidewalks . I would prefer if we could keep the separately mapped sidewalks since that is keeping more information in OpenStreetMap that could be useful to people. Many other areas of the US do have separately mapped sidewalks.

You're welcome. I have also, unfortunately, had problems with OsmInEdit before, and now I think it is probably better to do indoor mapping with JOSM. Making smaller changesets with OsmInEdit is probably a good idea because of the probability of errors.

This changeset moved over 60 nodes by large distances and also created over 80 nodes with no tags. These changes were probably unintended and a result of bugs in the OsmInEdit editor. I tried to fix those changes in changeset/179555948 and changeset/179557152.

This edit turned the entire city of Grand Island, Nebraska into a big building. I reverted this in 179144224. Presumably you wanted to add a specific building for Nebraskaland Distributors?

Hi, thanks for working on this area. I removed the name of this school area, see comment on changeset/175498800.

Hello. In this changeset you appeared to have added the tag building=house to relations 10322762, 12037189, and 2807121, which are train routes between Chicago and New York. I don't think that makes sense so I have deleted those tags in changeset/170595740.

To clarify, you mean you don't want a forest to cover a road if that road is visible, right?