i guess such a short stretch doesn't feel like a trunk road to me. i don't have a hard limit in mind, but i feel like for a road to temporarily "upgrade" its class, it needs to be for a longer stretch than just this? the trunk section of 56, for instance, goes from I 88 to where it merges back down from being a divided highway.

hello! what's the reasoning behind 47 briefly being a trunk road at the US 30 interchange?

Ah, thank you for linking that page of the wiki. I was unaware of that particular bit of information.

Please be a little more careful with your edits. You've ended up gluing the nodes of many admin boundary ways to non-boundary features.
The iD editor gives you the option to hide boundary features while you edit, which would make this sort of thing easier to avoid.

I've not had much luck with partial reverts in JOSM. Looks like there are some other elements glued to the boundary ways, too. Might just be best to go through and manually correct the boundary with a good source. I've got a bunch of annexations I need to add over in Kendall, so I can try to take a look at it when I do that.

It appears that way/33764746 was shifted, I'm assuming by accident? Most of Plainfield's boundary is now in the wrong place.

Thanks for fixing some of those issues! Just be careful: you removed a valid address point without adding its tags to any other object. I've re-added the address in question.

D'oh! Pardon this seeming out-of-place edit from this account, it should have been done under my personal username. I stand by the edit regardless, but it's not normal procedure for Kendall County GIS to be editing so far from the county boundary.

I think this would be a good spot for "short_name". I favor the "name" key essentially being equivalent to "official_name", then using "short_name" for any informal common abbreviation.
In my hometown, we had the "Alex M Mantino Junior High School", but everyone just called it "Mantino", even in official communications from school staff. But it's still not the official name.

And jeez, looking at it now, I've fallen way behind on some of this new construction and bike paths!

I do! You can see the latest Kendall County aerials on our GIS portal. Here's the webmap for our "latest imagery" basemap.
https://maps.co.kendall.il.us/portal/apps/mapviewer/index.html?webmap=49b9629323544f6c8b2482b51a80bf58
Imagery was flown this March.

There are two segments of 126, just east of US 30 / IL 59, which have the tag "la2=separate" added to them. I'm assuming that's a typo of some sort, but it wasn't obvious what it should have been, so I left it alone.

Oh yeah! Mapping electric utilities can get super intense and detailed. I only know a bit about it myself, but take a look at power=* for examples of all kinds of stuff.
The power lines you added might even be considered "minor_line", which I forgot about until I was reading the wiki page just now. The points themselves would probably just be power=pole.

Looks great! If you can tell from the imagery, it's a good idea to add some kind of tag to the nodes, too, to indicate what kind of utility pole / structure they are.

No worries! It wasn't too difficult to fix.

Done! From recent imagery I'd call a few of them medium, but the rest sparse.

D'oh! You're absolutely right, it should have been. The correct tag slipped my mind at the time. I have fixed these. Thanks!

Thanks for adding the different wings of the school. However, adding a feature with "area=yes" on it is generally not very useful unless it includes other tags. In this case, you could split the school feature and add these wing designations as a ref tag, or else add building_part features inside of the main building feature.

This is a residential area, and is seems very doubtful that JNS Glass is actually operating here. Can you please elaborate on why you think this feature should be here?

US 30 and 34 had a bunch of issues. 30 is fixed now, though, and I'll probably work through 34 today.
Sounds like they were broken before you got to them, then. The curse of being the last modifier, I suppose.