OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
167388323

great edits for the most part, but you snapped a couple of fences to the montgomery admin boundary. use the iD editor settings to turn boundary features off to avoid that in the future. keep up the great work!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167388323

158965770

Really late to the game here, but this looks like the I&M canal to me?

163823067

i know this was a minute ago, but regarding your not on the grassland next to the fire station: `landuse=meadow` would be a space designated for pasturing animals or growing hay. this is more likely a `natural=grassland`

165992996

*is* this a driveway? seems like it's only used to access parking spaces
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165992996

166035941

not sure what you did editing this one, but watch out. you converted to adjacent closed ways into weird multipolygons
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166035941

165922611

thanks for cleaning that up! just be careful, you deleted a legitimate address point. already fixed, and not a big deal. thanks again!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165922611

165901835

why add the business details to the area? now the bank and its address are split
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165901835

165911711

in some cases, the amenity=school tag is on the area corresponding to the school grounds, and is not needed on the point.

i don't like mapping schools inconsistently like this, but it's good enough for now. maybe eventually we swap the amenity areas for `landuse=education`, but i think this is okay to leave as is.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165911711

165938077

i missed that one. good catch!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165938077

165004479

what happened here? i see you already fixed these with real footprints, but i'm curious what this was about
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165004479

165638963

watch your changeset comments, this wasn't a minooka edit
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165638963

165006476

make sure to change your changeset comment when you're doing different kinds of work
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165006476

165400591

you extended roads here, but left the noexit=yes tags on nodes further north. also the new streets you drew crossed without intersecting. disconnected streets can't be routed properly. i already fixed it!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165400591

165401320

make sure your sidewalks stop at the pavement. the portion in the road would be highway=footway + footway=crossing
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165401320

165550094

oh, dangit. a little too fast on the trigger finger there, re-used my last changeset comment by accident. should say "fixing some erroneous edits to school areas"

164694746

thanks so much for updating these!

163582277

thanks for all these detailed edits to crossings! my only suggestion: if a crossing is marked, added a `crossing:markings` tag to make things as thorough as possible. happy mapping!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163582277

63889739

i know this was a minute ago, but it looks like this name change was a mistake

162262639

keep an eye on your changeset comments. this isn't really work associated with the osmus task, it's address / entrance mapping
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162262639

162399148

there was already a residential area covering this, keep an eye out for those
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162399148