OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
42635683

Hi, you seem to have removed a lot of valid data by HelioFelix. The tags were "ele=*" and "natural=peak", which are both valid. I don't know what you're seeing.

42543106

(JOSM ticket #13742 https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/13742 filed.)

42543106

I've updated the wiki page.

42543106

changeset/42579713. Note that JOSM gives me an error for that value; not sure if it's intended.

42543106

See lanes:psv=*. Should it be changed to refer to lanes:psv:conditional?

42543106

Well, it's what the wiki said… I'll change it then. Thanks.

42375949

Oh, okay then – sorry about that. New mappers can often copy copyrighted maps without realising that it's not allowed. Still, might be good for you to read the tutorial if you haven't already.

42375949

You may like to read this: osm.wiki/Beginners%27_guide

42375949

[Correction: "may have to be removed" should be "your uploaded changes may have to be removed".]

42375949

I can't stress this enough, but you should NEVER copy information from copyrighted maps without permission for commercial use from the dataset's owner. It is against the OSM rules, would otherwise violate the project's license (ODbL) and – if you have done this for all your changesets – may have to be removed.

42363866

This is almost definitely in the wrong place. 這差不多一定是在不正確的位置。

42375949

Why did you tag a reservoir as a building?

42263645

It's probably best to use minibus. Maybe ask help.osm.org or make a formal tag proposal? It's not so useful if it's not rendered or in JOSM presets.

42308186

Thanks :)

42263645

To 小智智: To confirm, should `psv=bus` be changed to `bus=designated` and `psv=gmb` be changed to `minibus=designated`? (Red minibuses, if any, would probably be `share_taxi`.)

38292078

Isn't the area under the bridge part of the Mainland?

37493368

These tracks should not be tagged as disused, as they are still actively maintained by the MTRC in case of service disruptions on the Tseung Kwan O Line (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kwun_Tong_Line#History).

37054714

Or, more logically, you could go with whatever is on the road signs that are *actually there* if there's a conflict between two sources.

37054657

This link is probably inaccurate and/or outdated. http://www.td.gov.hk/mini_site/hksrens/2008/EN/RouteMapL-R8.htm shows that, as signposted, route 8 ends at the end of the bridge between Tung Chung and Chek Lap Kok (at kilometre post 0). (However, both the expressway and the "route 8 end" sign are on the other side of the bridge.)

37054714

Probably inaccurate and/or outdated. May have had its trunk route designation removed when route 9 was created in 2006. http://www.td.gov.hk/mini_site/hksrens/2008/EN/RouteMapM.htm does not give this road a route number and it is not an expressway, so it should be highway=secondary.