OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
41612271

Thank you so much for this fix!

40071280

nice add!

39829462

that's so freaking awesome. keep on rocking it, yo!

39829462

nice adds!

39561529

nice adds!

36687018

:thumbsup:

36642218

Thanks (again), John!

36642199

Thanks, John!

35994426

not 'Cheda Ranch' as changeset comment indicates...my bad. It is beach access.

35540075

nice add, thanks!

35229163

please use 'local_knowledge' instead of 'Local knowledge' for your Value in the Source Key. http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=local_knowledge#values

34049002

why didn't you add this information to the existing building way? How do you know Rancho Grande Subaru occupies that specific location?

26356220

The way that you've imported individual parcels as landuse=residential is questionable as to how effective & worthwhile it really has been. Why not just hand-draw ways around the entire block and tag landuse=residential? Example: way/61148678

This has resulted in inconvenient editing for current/future users. Currently editors are trying to add building footprints to the area Southwest of Sanger, CA...but as they're digitizing, the 'parcels' often are in the way and need to be adjusted, they do not seem to be very accurate when compared to Bing/Mapbox Satellite.

Once again, with many of the imports I've seen...I wonder if it would have just been overall faster to do this by hand, because now we are adjusting EVERYTHING. Not sure how or if this can be resolved. One consideration is to just delete the imported features and redraw.

30105847

Lance, looks good. Remember to 'square' your buildings with the 'Q' key in JOSM

29894291

please use the keyboard shortcut 'Q' with JOSM to Orthogonalize Shape https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Shortcuts

28826550

I think A51 is more appropriate than A41 for this way way/10552398 ...as per this reference http://proximityone.com/tgrcfcc.htm

28826550

I think A74 is more appropriate than A51 for this way way/10535225 ...as per this reference http://proximityone.com/tgrcfcc.htm

27963476

@neuhausr thank you for this catch. This is an honest mistake we've made in which we did not adjust a setting in our JOSM Remote Control to 'Download objects to new layer' when we're using HOTOSM's Task Manager. We will fix this right now, thanks again.

27921381

I think you can delete this node. Duplicate. Way already exists way/96026787

24036473

How do you know this way/200341595 is content=water ?