j03lar50n's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 41612271 | Thank you so much for this fix! |
|
| 40071280 | nice add! |
|
| 39829462 | that's so freaking awesome. keep on rocking it, yo! |
|
| 39829462 | nice adds! |
|
| 39561529 | nice adds! |
|
| 36687018 | :thumbsup: |
|
| 36642218 | Thanks (again), John! |
|
| 36642199 | Thanks, John! |
|
| 35994426 | not 'Cheda Ranch' as changeset comment indicates...my bad. It is beach access. |
|
| 35540075 | nice add, thanks! |
|
| 35229163 | please use 'local_knowledge' instead of 'Local knowledge' for your Value in the Source Key. http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=local_knowledge#values |
|
| 34049002 | why didn't you add this information to the existing building way? How do you know Rancho Grande Subaru occupies that specific location? |
|
| 26356220 | The way that you've imported individual parcels as landuse=residential is questionable as to how effective & worthwhile it really has been. Why not just hand-draw ways around the entire block and tag landuse=residential? Example: way/61148678 This has resulted in inconvenient editing for current/future users. Currently editors are trying to add building footprints to the area Southwest of Sanger, CA...but as they're digitizing, the 'parcels' often are in the way and need to be adjusted, they do not seem to be very accurate when compared to Bing/Mapbox Satellite. Once again, with many of the imports I've seen...I wonder if it would have just been overall faster to do this by hand, because now we are adjusting EVERYTHING. Not sure how or if this can be resolved. One consideration is to just delete the imported features and redraw. |
|
| 30105847 | Lance, looks good. Remember to 'square' your buildings with the 'Q' key in JOSM |
|
| 29894291 | please use the keyboard shortcut 'Q' with JOSM to Orthogonalize Shape https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Shortcuts |
|
| 28826550 | I think A51 is more appropriate than A41 for this way way/10552398 ...as per this reference http://proximityone.com/tgrcfcc.htm |
|
| 28826550 | I think A74 is more appropriate than A51 for this way way/10535225 ...as per this reference http://proximityone.com/tgrcfcc.htm |
|
| 27963476 | @neuhausr thank you for this catch. This is an honest mistake we've made in which we did not adjust a setting in our JOSM Remote Control to 'Download objects to new layer' when we're using HOTOSM's Task Manager. We will fix this right now, thanks again. |
|
| 27921381 | I think you can delete this node. Duplicate. Way already exists way/96026787 |
|
| 24036473 | How do you know this way/200341595 is content=water ? |