Dear MelusBou, the source you have used may be too old, leading you to make inappropriate changes to Kiertomäentie.

I drove past this road entrance just a few days ago and saw a row of bollards that you claimed are not there. The node node/7684446674 should not have been removed.

This edit is a revert of my revert. The comment at changeset/110631700 still stands. Driving a car through here is not possible because of a physical barrier. Also, driving a car or motorcycle through here is illegal because of the traffic sign that is here. I plan to revert this edit, too.

Dear Joni, this changeset is too large as it covers large areas in Norway, Sweden and Finland. (I'm referring to the orange box that you see when you open this page: changeset/110678398 ). Please edit a small area at a time. This might mean uploading a single node, if your next edit will be hundreds of kilometers away.

So, please finalize and upload your changes before moving far away. It will make the “History” panel easier to understand for all mappers who are monitoring their local areas. osm.wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F#Large_changesets

Best regards, j

I will revert this change as it is completely wrong IMO. The road that you edited is for cycling and pedestrians only.

I have removed way/881038097 as there is Mapillary imagery from July 26, 2021 showing that there isn't a cycleway there.

Korjaus: muokkasin tien 145 vartta enkä 148:n

I have reverted your contribution because I suspect the information was false.

Yes, thanks. I was thinking of the "map what's on the ground" guideline (osm.wiki/On_the_ground). The visibility of :en tags will depend on the way the map data is used, for example OsmAnd is able to prefer displaying names in a certain language and then name:en would appear on a user's map.

Thanks for mapping around here. However I have removed the English translations you've added to road names and the name of the village.

This is vandalism and needs to be reverted. The name and ref changes are incorrect.

Kehä III cycleway removed, it was simply not correct way/880132466

Oh, sorry about that. Thanks for fixing them.

Hi!
Despite the visual disconnection you are still allowed to drive from one road to another. They are so called "continuous sidewalks". I shall restore the deleted segments shortly.

Source: "Kolmannen linjan ja Näkinkujan liittymät katkaistaan moottoriajoneuvoliikenteeltä. Neljännen linjan, Ässänrinteen, Kaikukujan, Kaikukadun, Lintulahdenkadun ja Sakarinkadun liittymät toteutetaan ylijatkettuina jalkakäytävinä." https://dev.hel.fi/paatokset/asia/hel-2017-009374/

Hello Ilkka, I don't think you were necessarily asking for help here but I'll offer advice. I think we should have a “Cycle & Foot Crossing” as the way type on this way[1]. Alternatively, one could just manually set the data field highway=cycleway. The reason is to have a complete network for bicycle routing.

[1] way/866782575

piti olla "katua varten" :)

Please note that bicycle=use_sidepath is used to denote this. It is like bicycle=no but also gives us information about why the cycling prohibition is there. bicycle=use_sidepath

...tai siis vaikutusalue yltää, mutta kuvaamaani reittiä ajava tienkäyttäjä ei näe sitä merkkiä koskaan.

I'm going to survey this street because I believe it's still two-way. One direction of travel may be dominant, but there's still cyclists coming from Pohjoisranta and people who parked their cars here and I speculate driving west is allowed for their sake.

Kävin tänään katsomassa, ja olet oikeassa. Lisäsin esteet takaisin.

Terve, Japsu. Voisitko poistaa sellaiset jättämäsi merkinnät, jotka eivät pidä paikkaansa, kuten pizzeria amiksen pihalla, luolansuu tässä pihamaalla, ja talolle lisäämäsi nimi.

Varsinaiset karttakohteiden parannukset tai lisäykset ovat kyllä tervetulleita, jos sellaisia haluat tehdä.