OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
112765184

Yep, I think that it should be ref=103_U379_074 instead of name=103_U379_074, but I'm not sure since I don't know where this codes came from

112765184

Hi Ahmed,

these look more like ref=* than name=* values. Where do they came from by the way?

118381339

Hi TrekClimbing,

just curious, what's the exact meaning of place=building_complex? You're the only one using this tag. It seems quite generic to me, it could be added to almost any landuse=residential, retail, commercial ecc.

118389485

Hi kof2001ignis,

you added an invalid place=* value here, could you check it out please?

node/5941926540/history

118410656

Uhm, I have some doubts about this: osm.wiki/Relations_are_not_categories

117000578

Ciao Balaabirami,

qua c'è una way senza tag: way/1027673008

questo nodo ha come tag solo comment:it=area pedonale (node/9474021421), cosa rappresenta?

118367596

Ciao, su OSM i tag sono per convenzione in inglese britannico, quindi larghezza=2 non va bene. Va usato width=2.

Inoltre per favore scrivi commenti ai changeset che descrivano ciò che hai modificato, qua trovi degli esempi: osm.wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments

118374990

Hi skipper76,

way/1039404054/history

what kind of place are the ones you added? place=yes is quite generic. Are they neighbourhood, city blocks, something else?

You can read some available values here: place=*

118355150

Hi Stephen,

as I already tried to explain you (changeset/117973822):

names should not be descriptions. So name=hut+building=yes
should be
building=hut

118291442

29.418 total changesets, 22.119 of them without comment.

At least 4 users already asked him to properly comment changesets in the last year:
1. changeset/96015876
2. changeset/112373185
3. changeset/117042655
4. changeset/117638017

118337524

Hi Dimitar155,

node/9569531605

what type of place is this one? place=yes is quite generic

118301576

This is their second try importing stuff: changeset/117872687

Good luck commenting them changesets, they didn't replied once: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15178304

118316907

Hi Thomas,

I saw you added two place=Idsingen, I suppose you wanted to use addr:place=Idsingen?

118311811

Hi MaksKZ,

way/673816457/history

place=residential is not a common value. Also the place you added is already mapped as a node (node/2598689068/history): osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

I would restore the previous situation, what you think?

118248001

Hi Arbs,

I don't think the place=* node fits well a ski restort. Are you aware of this tags: osm.wiki/Winter_sports#Resorts ?

82019675

Hi Ernesto, this comments are two years old but the tags are still there (example: way/779980768/history ), I see you're still an active user, could you fix them?

118189458

Hi Chetan, why you deleted the old place node and created an identical new one instead of just moving it?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118189458

118155419

Ho linkato per sbaglio la way, la relazione è questa: relation/8368355

118155419

Dal momento che i tag sono stati trasferiti da un elemento all'altro (dalla relazione alla way) ovviamente sembra lo abbia creato io, ma prendiamo ad esempio il landuse che avevi citato prima (la way/595901649): è stato creato tre anni come relazione (way/595901649/history). History e Pewu dando la storia del singolo elemento non danno una visione d'insieme, ma da OSMcha si vede. Ciao.

118146193

Hi Chetan,

osm.wiki/Tag%3Aamenity%3Dshop

amenity=shop is deprecated, please don't use it anymore. Also please add a meaningful changeset comment: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments