This is incorrect. It is correct to have highway=crossing on the node. highway=footway should be on a way, and it is already. I've reverted your change in changeset/106987959.

Hello. Please know that whatever app you are using is enabling you to make changes to OpenStreetMap, a global, community-built app. If you would like to test out the app without making any changes to the real world map, make the app use the OSM development server instead.

This partially reverts changesets 105447152 105447007 105446669 105446279 105445954 105445660 105445024 105444970 105444847 105444549 105443878 105443624 105442985 105438193 105437913 105437744 105437446 105437081

This partially reverts changesets 105494859, 105494503, 105494098, 105451435, 105451278, 105451030, 105449902, 105449644, 105449347, 105449126, and 105448837

Hello,
Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! Please note that this is a community-run database used by multiple apps and data consumers. As such, it shouldn't be used for fictional or experimental edits.

Is this correct? I don't remember these freeways being toll roads. Maybe you meant something like toll=no + toll:express=yes, to cover FasTrak lanes.

I do carefully check that imported buildings match overhead imagery, but height is a little bit harder to verify. I've removed the tag.

This change includes a number of duplicate addresses (including unit number, and without feature tags). Is there a way to clean that up or should they be left?

Reverted in changeset/104467927

Reverted in changeset/104467927

Reverted with changeset/104466858

Reverted with changeset/104466858

The bounding box was accurate before you changed it. Reverted in changeset/104150179.

Reverted in changeset/104150041 to restore alignment

Reverted in changeset/104149835

Please don't move buildings in this area to align to imagery. We have imported the building outlines from an authoritative source. The imagery is incorrect.

Here is the new area you made that encompasses the hotel's land area: way/935737076 You can see that since it is not a building, I removed the "building" tag from it. Buildings within the larger hotel area should keep the "building" tag.

This removes the name and contact information of an adjacent, unrelated hotel. Reverted in changeset/103714183

When drawing an area around a hotel campus, be sure to remove the "building" tag from the boundary, since the buildings are mapped separately. Fixed in changeset/103714039

When drawing an area around the campus of a hotel, be sure to delete the "building" tag. Also be careful not to connect it to unrelated things, like a post box or another building. Fixed in changeset/103713945