way/222895188 Should not be a motorway. it should be secondary link because that is the only way for traffic from the side road to get to Kymis.

This changeset has been reverted in accordance with the Prespa Agreement, which came into force on 8 February 2019. The country is now commonly known as North Macedonia.

If I recall correctly, OpenStreetMap takes a dim view of political disputes, and that OpenStreetMap does not want to be a battleground for any political disputes, including the Macedonian naming dispute.

Please take any political disputes to the General section of the NationStates Forum, and please maintain civility there. ;-)

UPDATE: We talked it through and it's all fine. I apologised to the editor for sounding harsh but the Crimea dispute had been really frustrating since OSM does not have to pick a side.

Hello again, when comparing this version of the Aegean Sea relation with the previous version, it appears that Sanwer removed the Macedonian names.

In absence of a good explanation, I see it to be politically motivated. Since OSM is not a political battleground, this could be grounds for a DWG report unless the user can explain the removal.

Sources:
osm.org/api/0.6/relation/4594226/128
osm.org/api/0.6/relation/4594226/129

I'm sorry if I sounded harsh again, I am not really coping well any more. I feel that the disputes in the Greek community is getting too much for me. BTW, I had to fix Koropi South junction because of another illogical motorway link: osm.org/#map=17/37.89954/23.90513 — Maybe you could create a small task to fix the motorway links in Greece.

I am not happy with this edit: you don't understand that the A62 ends just before the u-turn. Partly reverted by changeset/69724815.

Yes, the links on the middle of a lower-class road, on the grade-separated interchange, do not have motorway restrictions.

That and way/217799896 should be primary because that is the route for the EO83 traffic to access the roundabout. The opposite side stays as secondary because it has to cross another major junction before the traffic can join the EO83.

As for the second junction, and any grade separated junction, I was thinking more of osm.org/#map=18/51.70614/-0.38238 - I could not classify the crossing roads as motorway_link because it made no sense when it is sandwiched between two unrestricted roads. so there is a case for using secondary_link in this grade separated junction. I am also sure that there was a traffic flow relation at some point: in any case they exist because some routers … some routers sometimes recommend illegal turns without them.

Hello there,

For example: way/437409814 is not a motorway link because the tertiary side road merges into a motorway slip road in the process of joining a secondary road. It should realistically be secondary.

At way/561182489, the link roads that cross Tatoi should be a secondary link, because they are not part of a motorway. You also must be sure not to merge ways without checking that there is no turn restriction or traffic flow directive, which exist to reinforce the norms of Greek driving law.

Unfortunately, there is a user who thinks it is okay to map motorway junctions so crudely (see osm.org/#map=18/37.80333/22.73178), despite the fact that the remainder of the slip roads are motorway_link since there is "no escape".

I am very sorry for sounding harsh, this concern could have not come at a worse time when there is a serious community dispute over road names and numbers — it is so tempting to suggest organised editors to sit out while the crisis continues. My position is that "Odos" and "Leoforos" go to "name:prefix"=*, and that National Road (EO) numbers go to ref=* because they are in the law. I think that is a reasonable compromise.

^ Aww man, my grammar is awful. This could have not come at a worse time when there is a serious dispute over road numbers and road naming.

It seems that 69617882, 69617940 69618528 have unintentionally deleted valid data.

In this changeset, you deleted the relation for National Road 3.

You deleted a provincial road relation, but why? I think JOSM is behaving badly.

In this changeset, you removed a perfectly valid tunnel name that was signed.

I am not happy with how you assign some of the side roads to a motorway when it is really not, such as the slip roads on the Athinon.

Hi there, I kindly request that you be careful to ensure that the road numbers and formats are correct: you can discard the nat_ref value if it is wrong (the main motorway is numbered the A1 instead of the EO1).

That's odd. I thought that if SNCF Mobilités were merely running trains on the network, then they could not be listed as an operator.

There is no ULEZ charge if a diesel vehicle meets the Euro 6 standard, and that is why the charge applies to vehicles below Euro 6.

I will change that, but I had to improvise the values because the key doesn't document conditional charges properly, and I don't think we ever had access rules based on emission standards.

Hi, I think I have done my best to portray the road condition (surface and smoothness) despite the current policy being that villages be linked by at least one tertiary road. If you like, I can change the smoothness to "very_bad" instead of "bad".