ika-chan!'s Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 61753670 | That's odd. I thought that if SNCF Mobilités were merely running trains on the network, then they could not be listed as an operator. |
|
| 68367743 | There is no ULEZ charge if a diesel vehicle meets the Euro 6 standard, and that is why the charge applies to vehicles below Euro 6. |
|
| 68367743 | I will change that, but I had to improvise the values because the key doesn't document conditional charges properly, and I don't think we ever had access rules based on emission standards. |
|
| 66443000 | Hi, I think I have done my best to portray the road condition (surface and smoothness) despite the current policy being that villages be linked by at least one tertiary road. If you like, I can change the smoothness to "very_bad" instead of "bad". |
|
| 67825917 | Hi there, I have done the north of the city, and added the necessary editing notes there to clear up any confusion for others. I happened to have enough time today. |
|
| 67813467 | I am sorry about that. I will get onto it in the next changeset. I will say it is Bing, based on the OSBL. |
|
| 67387631 | Hi there, I think the name:UN=* tag may no longer be needed. The now-obsolete FYROM name could go to old_name:UN=* and local language variants. |
|
| 66963145 | Dang! It was supposed to be DigitalGlobe Premium Imagery as the source. |
|
| 36331012 | Hi, it's a named junction. |
|
| 66443316 | Why you downgrade roads between villages and hamlets to a dirt road? The current consensus is to connect all villages and hamlets with a tertiary road, and using surface=* and smoothness=* to describe the condition. |
|
| 62822924 | Source for the above message: way/32502470/history. |
|
| 62822924 | George_ath actually came up with this scheme. |
|
| 62790017 | Hi, with all due respect, it is not that we do not like you, but in order for OSM to succeed we have to follow consensus, otherwise the map would be too messy and unusable. If you want to propose a change to a standard, you should ask in the forums or the wiki, rather than just editing the whole data yourself and leaving the wider community confused or unreasonably suspicious. |
|
| 62790017 | I have read them, but that is not enough of evidence to justify the change. The bottom line is you are doing this without the consensus of the community. |
|
| 62790017 | Please see my reply at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=716746#p716746. |
|
| 62792032 | Hi, only the A8 east of the Korinthos interchange is part of the E94 European road. Source: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/vylF_ZADdYCOnrdxWcyuHA |
|
| 62790017 | I believe that both ΕΟ and Ε.Ο. are equally valid, but when we really started to streamline the roads on OSM, ΕΟ appeared to be the dominant format and thus I merely went along with it. |
|
| 62790017 | Yes, the dot. If OpenStreetMap for Garmin is making the initials appear like Eo, then it is the software developer that should fix it, not us. |
|
| 62790017 | You are still going against consensus on the road numbers. |
|
| 62477320 | Okay. I do data validation from time to time. |