I have to enquire about this changeset because I positioned the point of merger in accordance with osm.wiki/Proposal:Placement. If you think there is a better way please let me know and I will see what I can do.

I don't think embankment=yes and layer=1 is generally allowed according to embankment=*#How_to_map. The wiki says that such combination should not be used without a good reason.

This changeset looks unusual from your most recent edits, because my Osmose dashboard is lighting up like a Christmas tree: what is the source for this autoroute?

The fatal bridge collapsed actually occurred over Diodorou, although that bridge was scheduled for demolition regardless. Source: https://www.ekathimerini.com/news/1216162/three-people-arrested-over-deadly-bridge-collapse-near-patras - the local road diversion is expected to last until Friday, and the motorway contraflow will last until around 1 June 2024.

I can assure you that this is not an import, but a testament to how fast I can edit with Potlatch 3: the development of Potlatch must continue.

See: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/huge-import-by-josail/100460 - I don't think this import can stand if some of the items have Google as the source.

I have now marked the affected roads with "motor_vehicle=destination" to signify no access to motor vehicles except, for example, access to farms. It may take a while for the routers to pick up the restrictions.

I can accept that the changeset comment was a bit off because of me using Potlatch, but I did my best to keep the access restrictions for motor vehicles.

According to construction=*, I cannot mark a road as under construction if anything other than motor vehicles can still pass, and it is unclear if this is a short-term closure or not.

The wiki says that we should only tag construction sites if they are planned to be closed to all traffic for at least six to nine months.

Context: the Maxar Premium Imagery layer in Go Map!! is not working because it uses an expired API key. Updates to the app appear to be sparse.

Dang it! I thought I had saved the Greek changes in another changeset.

What are the sources for your edits?

Dang it: I forgot to close the changeset before moving south!

I am sadly not satisfied that a double white line means it is illegal to cross them under circumstances. Which rule of the highway code in Greece says it is illegal to turn left on a double white line?

Mapillary imagery does not suggest any signage that suggest it is illegal to turn left from the EO77, nor it is illegal to turn left to the EO77. I think you are confusing these restrictions with no overtaking: there is a tag for no overtaking restrictions.

A few redundant u-turn relations (with the same "start" and "end" way) were also removed.

Accidentally hit the "C" key while working on it.

Please, stop adding roads that do not exist: we cannot accept roads where construction has not even started yet. If you continue to add non-existent roads, we may have to consider moderator action, that is, if anyone really pays attention to the damage that fantasy roads can cause to our reputation.

I have decided to remove the street cleaning cycle data.

This is because this type of data was very trivial, and the data could easily go out of date for various reasons, such as demand: furthermore, street cleaning cycles are very hard to verify, unlike bus routes.

This changeset failed, because of a bug in Potlatch.

There is a possibility that I may have to change or remove the road maintenance relation and its members as I see fit to comply with whatever tagging standard I can find. Please see: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/unusual-tagging-in-saint-martin/8650/4?u=ika-chan