Shaky proof? Although Sentinel Playground is not suitable for mapping on OSM, they are very recent enough for a different purpose of uncovering fictitious edits. If those bypasses were real, Sentinel Playground would have shown it right now, and that would then be a cue to begin verifying the alignment with on-the-ground surveys or compatible imagery, such as Maxar Premium Imagery or Bing.

I am confident that way/1102121440 does not reflect reality, according to Maxar Premium Imagery: they are usually recent.

Hopefully, Maxar will provide imagery showing the points where the contraflow transition points.

In node/360097490/history, you removed names in other languages: while we certainly can determine how we implement int_name=* and name=*, I think the use of names in other languages such as Hungarian and French are more of a responsibility of the respective language mappers, who may know more about how they name places in their languages.

Route Master relations are supposed to only contain relations as members, and not nodes or ways. See: osm.wiki/Public_transport#Route_Master_relations

Okay, I fixed the relations. Here is how routes work: osm.wiki/Public_transport#Service_routes - one object (stop_position) per stop to the route relations.

Can you wait a bit while I try and recover the relations? I tried to do it and I keep getting an edit conflict.

I feel that some changesets may need to be reverted to recover the lost relations and station layouts. Afterwards, you can redo any changes while respecting the public transport v2 relation. I am currently tired and I don't know how to do it without making a mess with the merge conflicts and such. I am cautious not to do something that might make the problem worse.

Hello, why do you remove stops from train relations and delete public transport stop relations (relation/14007291/history)? They are an important part of the public transport system.

The tag railway=rail are meant only for railways with active passenger or freight service. The correct tags should be railway=disused and disused:railway=narrow_gauge.

Source: railway=disused

Hello, I believe you did a lot of street light mapping in Mont-de-Marsan over the years, and I wonder if you could review and revise the material values of the street light poles (material)=*, because it appears that the current values (e.g. "Ag", "At", "Béton", etc.) are deprecated according to https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#username=&zoom=13&lat=43.8975&lon=-0.475&item=3040. Valid alternative values include: "steel", "concrete" and "iron".

In this changeset, way/1062346082 is an example of a fantasy road that you added recently. You cannot just add roads out of thin air, expecting that Greek authorities will quickly build it. Even if Greece was the richest country in the world, we still have to map reality, not fantasy.

I forgot to say that provincial roads are generally highway=secondary, so therefore I am applying this rule to nearly all cases.

Hello, it's a rather old changeset, and I have already been tagging new solar plants with power=plant et al for quite a while now.

There is no A4 motorway in Greece at the moment. What is the source for these edits?

Why did you downgrade so many urban roads of Heraklion to tertiary or lower? A good number of them are important enough to be primary or secondary.

Classification rules in a nutshell: osm.wiki/Greece/Highways

It would be appreciated if you could elaborate on what you are actually doing in changeset comments, rather than just saying "Update".

According to railway=tram_stop, there has to be a tram stop for each direction. They are not like railway stations.

Valid example of tram stop: node/7498860477

Correction: The source should be should be existing OSM data. This is why I think we need multiple profile support on JOSM.

The motorway A26 doesn't exist, what is the source for that?