Note that minor roads in industrial areas should not be tagged as tertiary. Tertiary is meant for roads that link populated areas together (highway=tertiary). The ones you changed should likely remain "unclassified".
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139808955

Hello, can you please share where you got the name for this way? way/836809199. Exit ramps don't normally have names and especially don't have names like that.

Please stop deleting service roads. That is useful information.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136833571

It's great to see that you're improving the data. Please try to use actual OpenStreetMap tags, though. "Category" is not a valid tag. If you want to work with us to figure out how to tag garage door shops, please let us know!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136767376

Please don't delete service roads and driveways.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136540548

Once again: please do not delete existing objects only to replace them. Improve existing data.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136301015

Please don't delete objects only to replace them. Please improve the existing data.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136409399

Please don't delete service roads. Those are immensely useful to others.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136412352

When adding a street name, it's important to fully spell out the name instead of abbreviating it. Computers know how to abbreviate, but they can't expand an abbreviation.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136336476

It looks like you deleted a rather large chunk of this water body. Did you mean to do that?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136335585

Please make sure you're using the most up-to-date imagery. Some of the changes you made don't reflect the latest state. The parking lot at Malcolm Yards, for example, is there and should not have been deleted. Also, when improving geometry of an existing object, please don't delete it and redraw it. This removes any trace of the previous people that have worked on it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135559350

Why did you delete this road? Does it not exist anymore?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134772733

I would say that that practice is controversial at best: osm.wiki/Talk:Buses#Bus_Route_Naming

The name of the route is "Green Line" and the from/to directionality information is present in the "from" and "to" tags. Including the from/to in the name is redundant and incorrect.

I understand the two different directions, but that's not the name of the route. The "name" should be tagged "Green Line" in all three relations.

But the name of the transport line is "Green Line", not "Green Line A to B".

Hello, thanks for adding a translation. Why are you including the from and to in the name? The name:fr tag should probably just be "Ligne Verte"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134553448

Please don't delete roads to remap them...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134274220

Can you share more about why you made this change? It looks like you're duplicating an existing road.

FYI You shouldn't use Wikipedia as a primary source for population estimates. It's pretty easy to go straight to census.gov and check population estimates using their QuickFacts system. For example: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/nilescityohio
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133629339

Reverted. Please don't delete roads to fix them. Please don't delete service roads.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/133530837