Ciao vmicho

It's great for pedestrian routing that you're adding sidewalks adjacent to the streets.
If you do this, it is advisable though to add a `separate`-sidewalk tag to the street, as specified on the OSM Wiki: sidewalk=*#Separately_mapped_sidewalks
Can you update the streets you've edited in your recent changesets with `sidewalk:both=separate`?

Greetings,
habi

Can you tell us what `operator:type=snc` means?
You’re the first one to introduce this to OSM: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/operator%3Atype=snc#overview

I would try to make it 'semantically' correct, e.g. add a path to the ping pong table, and add a service highway to the parking.
That there's no good way to pass between the ping pong table an the parking is - albeit based on the barrier - then mapped by the footway and service highway not being connected.

Mersi!

Mersi!

Sorry, I misinterpreted the lonesome node.
Reverted my merge with changeset/137413944

But the barrier needs to be connected to a path or way to make ‚semantic‘ sense: barrier=*
Such a way is missing here…

node/10979461217 was added as a duplicate of node/295941367/
I merged both barriers.

And also not connected to way/11787543/

way/1182332777/ was not connected to way/147046122/, I've updated this :)

Here you've added a duplicate path to way/583999765/
I'm removing your addition and aligned the already present path a bit.

Now you’re just fiddling with tags.
I’ll take care of the building once it officially opens.

"'simply' to directional road signs?" should be "'simply' two directional road signs?"

Are there really two guideposts (information=guidepost) in the middle of the traffic islands, or 'simply' to directional road signs?
If yes, then node/10970375041 and node/10970375043 should be mapped as traffic_sign=*

PS: Also please try to be a bit more descriptive in your changeset comments, as suggested in osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments. All your recent chagnes are simply commented with "Domdidier", making it more difficult to find out what you've tried to accomplish.

Hey loicdufresne

This thing in the middle of the roundabout (way/1181261285) is most probably *not* a garden: "set aside for the display, cultivation, and enjoyment of plants and other forms of nature" (as steted in the OSM Wiki) but should be mapped as osm.wiki/Tag%3Atraffic_calming%3Disland

This 'smells' of tagging for the renderer, so that the island shows up as a green circle in the middle of the roundabout. Please try to 'abstract' the stuff you see on the ground into correct OSM tagging.

Greetings from Bern,
habi

Hey vmicho!

You've changed my traffic calming island (way/1177549923) to landuse=grass and barrier=wall.
This is *definitevely* not `landuse=grass` as seen on the swisstopo imagery, it's a little bit of shrubbery and mostly stones/gravel.
Please don't just tag for the renderer, i.e. so that this shows up as a green circle on OSM Carto!
Try to add correct data to OSM, not just to make it look pretty.

Also, if you *really* insist on doubly-tagging this landuse with a wall around it, then please also add a `height`-value.
IIRC when I passed this roundabout on bike it didn't really look like there's a 'wall', and the shadows on the swisstopo imagery seem to confirm this.

In addition you've added way/1181861983/ as traffic island. In my opinion and according to the wiki this tag should only be used for the structure that is *not* possible to pass by vehicles. In my opinion here this looks like it could be passed by cars and trucks, hence I would not tag this as island. See osm.wiki/DE:Tag:traffic_calming%3Disland for an explanation.

Greetings from Bern,
habi

way/1020502426 hätte eigentlich nicht in dieses Changeset gehört, sorry!

Im Katasterplan Bern heisst das Ding Längfeld, ich hab' das dementsprechend angepasst.

Der Name gehört auch hier eher in die Beschreibung.
Gehört das alte Magazin denn irgendwie zum Ortsmuseum in alten Bären?

Und alle betreffenden Gebäude an MOPUBE angepasst