gurglypipe's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 65826608 | Hi, thanks for your edits. It looks like you mistakenly merged a bus stop (‘naptan’) node with the fire station in this edit. I’ve tidied that up in this edit: changeset/65827973. I also straightened the walls of the health centre — you can do this in the ID editor by pressing ‘s’ (for ‘square’) when an area is selected. Happy editing. :-) |
|
| 65679242 | Whoops, thanks. |
|
| 65700798 | Hey, just a quick note: you can square up the corners of a building in the ID editor by selecting the building and pressing ‘s’. Makes drawing buildings quite a bit easier. :-) |
|
| 65556730 | I tweaked it a bit and added some FHRS tagging around Market Place in changeset/65575058. Hope that’s OK. The FHRS data comes from https://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs/district-13.html, and provides postcodes with the correct license. More info here: fhrs:id=*
|
|
| 65556208 | Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM! Do you know if Brew has replaced the deli at 18a Brock St?
|
|
| 65547864 | Please at least add the HE_ref tags so the heritage sites can link to the canonical source of English heritage data, rather than redirecting through wikidata.
|
|
| 65542514 | Tweaked in changeset/65544904. I hope that’s OK. Thanks for your work on everything!
|
|
| 65542514 | I think it should be at level=0, since it’s at ground level. level=-1 is underground. I’ll fix it up.
|
|
| 65509797 | And here: listed_status=*
|
|
| 65509797 | The wiki gives a few more tags which should be used for indicating listed status: osm.wiki/Tag:heritage:operator=, HE_ref= and osm.wiki/Tag:listed_status=. See here: changeset/65528977
|
|
| 65507177 | Delete what? Why?
|
|
| 65507273 | Note that instead of deleting closed shops/banks, you could (for example) change from shop=beauty to disused:shop=beauty, delete the business-specific tags like the website, but keep the address. That way the postcode and building number information doesn’t get lost. See osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix for details.
|
|
| 65417623 | I realise that (I am a cyclist). It still seems redundant to add bicycle=yes to roads when the default legal status is for bikes to be allowed on roads. Similarly, the default legal status for motorways is for bikes to not be allowed, so tagging them with bicycle=no seems redundant. Where has all this data come from? |
|
| 65417623 | You’ve put bicycle=yes on the Caton Road interchange even though there are cycle paths explicitly mapped separately from the roadway. Why? Where has all this data come from?
|
|
| 65317069 | (Source is presumably: https://www.grough.co.uk/magazine/2018/08/09/england-has-a-new-mountain-miller-moss-now-go-find-it)
|
|
| 65308878 | If you know these are definitely all terraced houses, you could use building=terrace to leave a bit more information in the map.
|
|
| 65294984 | Hi, this shop appears to already exist in the building just to the north. Have they expanded, or is this a duplicate?
|
|
| 65241373 | Wow, where’d you get all this data from?
|
|
| 65061876 | Nice work. :-) |
|
| 65019765 | No worries, thanks for your edits and responsiveness! I would interpret that tutorial as meaning you shouldn’t keep the editor open for days, working on unrelated changes all over the map. :-) |