Yeah.
There is no road named Vågavågen, perhaps a path at best, but certainly no named street.
Vågavågen is the name of the bay next to the adresses.
But the adresses are correct. They come from the official (very accurate) norwegian adress register (legal source, imported).
What is wrong here is the highway=water tag that obviously was a hack. If anything, that tag is the one that should be removed. After all, it is just to mute some inspectors that can perfectly well be ignored.
Regarding addr:place: I can see the idea, but I personally don't like it. It just makes it harder to keep the adresses updated and harder for data consumers to use them.

If you want to remove the highway=water, I won't be offended :)

It is being reconstructed. I will eventually get to reuse it, but do whatever you want to with it.

Done.

No, it is not the same as way/5009690. There is not a oneway restriction here, just a priority for those who come from NW.
It might be misuse of the oneway tag for this, so I'd be happy to change to a better alternative, but I have not found one yet.

Noen spesiell grunn til at du slettet Ålgårdsslåtten (way/40585137)? Har undeleted den nå.

No idea. Fixed it now. Just fix it if you find more.

Sure! You don't need to ask me for such small changes.

Go ahead

Det kan hende jeg var litt rask på labben når jeg leste denne (eller en annen gjengivelse av Vegvesenet si pressemelding).
http://www.nordlys.no/steinras-stenger-e6-apner-uferdig-tunnel-for-trafikk/s/5-34-175814

Why did you change Rogfast project from proposed to construction? No construction has been started. The project hasn't even been finally approved.

There are some strange tags on ways in this changeset, please review your edit. Examplres: way/340066493, way/340068419, way/340068418

Correcting changeset comment: Reusing redundant addr interpolating ways

Correcting changeset comment: Reusing interpolation ways

Uffda. Det er nok jeg som har glemt dem. Pleier å gjenbruke noder, i stedet for å slette, i hvert changeset. Gjør som du vil :-) Eller så tar jeg det senere.

Are you thinking about changeset/30013005 ? Please comment on the relevant changeset.

Discussion about what symbol to use posessive where name ends in s, z and x: http://lists.nuug.no/pipermail/kart/2014-October/004976.html

This changeset only touched the addr:postcode, as the comment clearly says. Please comment on the original changeset.

Example?

Ouch. This was an unfortunate slip. Was working to manually merge in an external data set, and the whole thing got sucked up. Sorry. This is a legal source, and I will commit to clean it up by merging into existing data.

The tags on many of the buildings in this changeset seems have come from a failed import of some sort. Please review.