Dette changesettet overskrev "on the ground" observasjoner.
Se f.eks way/115664331 Bygget er revet

Thanks for doing the correction for me.

You, having been on the ground and most recent, clearly have the best position to judge that.

Lenge siden, men husker du hva du mente med å tagge Problemveien med note=two separate lanes ?

To close note/1783473. Norway Orthophoto

. (sorry, pressed comment to quick)
To me, those ways look like they should be steps?

Hi Z
Seems like some of the ways in this changeset is tagged with "highway=ccontrution"

Hi Reitu
Welcome as a contributor to OpenStreetMap.
You have been very active since you signed up!

A few comments: You have sometimes put the name of a road in the "highway" tag. An example is way/913769485 in this changeset.
The name should go into the "name" tag instead. The "higway" tag should be the type of road, something like "residential", to be visible on the map.

It is reccommended to write a short comment on each changeset, like "added some missing residential roads" f.ex.

It is also recommended to write what source you used for the change. "Survey" is just fine if you actually walked the road yourself, f.ex.

Both these fields are very visible in the upload dialogue of JOSM.

best regards

-gormur

Det står allerede layer=-1 på tunnelen, så det har ingen effekt å tagge bygningen med layer=1.
Objekter som ikke har en layer-tagg blir regnet som layer=0 og der er dermed akkurat like mye "ikke-i-tunnelen" som layer=1...

Norge i bilder er feil... Bommen ble flyttet en rundkjøring nordover før tunnelen åpnet...
https://www.aftenbladet.no/lokalt/i/qLd1GE/bomstasjon-pa-motorveien-er-flyttet
Også observert i terreng.

way/427392272 Did you walk this? Was there a path? I haven't been there, but I can't see anything on orthophoto, and then there is note/2105019

Hei Kol Jørn :)
Ser du har tegnet inn masse båtruter...
Men litt usikker på hensikten med noen av dem. F.eks way/778781089 og de tre andre ved siden av. De er tagget helt likt og går samme plass. Er det noe tanke med det? Eller bare kopiert fra noen plass?

Ja, var nok annet holde styr på...
Har f.eks ikke funnet nye vegnummer på "Motorveien" mellom Madlaveien og Ullandhaugveien.
Du er selvfølgelig velkommen til å fikse :)

Did you have a particular way or relation in mind?
Perhaps you are talking about relation/7503548 ?
I (and many others) find it interesting to have data about old and removed train and tramlines in OSM.
I did not know about this particular line when I traveled through the area, but I saw many hints of it; old station buildings, embankments, alignments etc. But no tracks. Very visible to me, perhaps not so visible for you :)
It gave me great pleasure to research and discover the whole alignment and have to have all the little hints explained.
Also, many Wikipedia articles use this data to display the historic line in a map.

So I think this data is very suitable for OSM :)

All the best

Hei peet192
Ser du har slettet det midlertidige bybane-depotet. Men kan det hende at deler av gamle vossebanen også forsvant i dragsuget? Er skinnene fjernet fullstendig? De er mange som ville foretrukket å beholde litt jernbanehistorie og dermed heller byttet tagging til railway=disused/abandoned/razed.
Artiklene om nedlagte jernbaner i wikipedia bruker f.eks disse dataene.

Fixed, thanks.

You might very well be right. You are of course free to edit as you see fit.

Her har det sneket seg inn en duplikat på fergestrekningen Halhjem-Sandvikvåg.... way/625520455

way/20039839/
Somehow a name ended up in the highway tag. Perhaps you know witch name is correct?

Hi! On node/3584842493/ what does gauge=① mean? The gauge tag is usually only used for the railways themselves. Perhaps you are thinking of platform number?