GinaroZ has fixed the hotel now.

I think it would be better to create distinct changesets for different areas instead of creating changesets spreading over half Europe.

Bach, natürlich.

If you had put the changes in England and in Tanzania into separate changesets, the resulting changesets wouldn't be sooo huge.

It would surely have been better to make these changes in two changesets instead of using one which spreads over half Europe, Africa and Asia.
Besides, are there really two adjacent guest houses named "Blue Star"?

Hausnummer A6? Echt jetzt?

Splitting the changes in Australia and the one change in Iceland into two changesets would have made those changesets quite small, compared to this one.

Welcome to OSM!
It would be better to split up the changesets by region: one changeset for London (1 object), one changeset for Valencia (2 objects) and one changeset for Bloemfontein (3 objects). This avoids having a changeset which spreads into regions which are completely unaffected by the changes (Germany, Poland, France, etc.).

It would be better to group the changes by region and not to put everything into one huge changeset. See how the changeset now unnecessarily includes nearly all Africa, Europe and Asia.

At this place, thanks again to whb for fixing the problem. I tried to do the same, but my JOSM failed loading the objects (changeset, building and points), and iD failed as well.

What is the purpose of the building way/450702564, spanning nearly all South and North America and a big part of Europe? See also https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/450702564.

Test failed. It would be better to limit your tests to geographically small regions and make changes in different parts of the world in different changesets. Look how this changeset includes "half the world" and how small they would be if you did the changes in South America and Russia in different changesets.

Woudn't it be possible to split up such big changesets into geographically smaller areas if they are this far away from each other?

It would have been better to keep the changes in Hamburg and in Saint-François in separate changesets. This way, a huge changeset covering half Western Europe and half Northwestern Africa has been created.

War tatsächlich ein Fehler. Danke für den Hinweis!
Ist nun gefixt: changeset/43010368

Und einige der vorhandenen sind sehr vage, weil ich nur den ungefähren Verlauf kenne oder mich an Indizien entlanghangele, gerade im Bereich HOM, Blieskastel, Mandelbachtal. Falls du da genauere Daten hast, wäre das klasse…

FYI: Ich habe einige der hier entstandenen Relationen mal in osm.wiki/Landkreis_St._Wendel eingetragen.

FYI: Ich habe einige der hier entstandenen Relationen mal in osm.wiki/Landkreis_St._Wendel eingetragen.

gemeint war Neukahlenberger Hof.

Ich bezweifele ja, dass die Sittersklamm von der Blies aus bewässert wird und in die Quelle entwässert :-P Ich hab sie mal rumgedreht.