Unsinn. Gemeint war:
Blieswanderweg: französische Bezeichnung "Rando de la Blies" ergänzt

What does that mean? It would be polite to write change set descriptions and other texts either in the local language or at least in English.

Is this Petro Poroschenko's house?

Could you have another look at relation/179796? It looks as it is open now.

Da bin ich mir ehrlich gesagt gar nicht mehr so ganz sicher, sorry…

Das ist Unsinn. Korrekt wäre: "Waldwege, source=Esri Clarity;survey"

Verhinterung. Genau. Hab ich wieder toll gemacht.

This and some other of your changesets made some boundary relations incomplete. As a local, could you have another look to them?

You changed some relations so that they are now mostly empty (5183342 and 2879957). Was that deliberate?

Seems to look good now! Thank you.

Danke! :-D

Could you have a look at the admin relations you modified here? Since then, they are not correct any longer due to the missing way/534126126. Besides, a piece of the road went missing between node/1953070225 and node/2266467105.

are there really two Rio Zios beneath each other?

Even if some boundaries are obsolete, it would be useful not to leave any incomplete boundary relations around. It would be helpful if the relations changed in this changeset would be repaired ASAP.

You added relation/8108246 when relation/7696233 still existed. What is the difference?

Das war mein Changeset #5000, und ich habe es NICHT gemerkt. Schande über mich.

Antwort des OP in https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=690301#p690301

Isn't Malabon an administrative entity any longer? Or why was "type=boundary" and "boundary=administrative" removed from relation/403176? As I think it still exists, I restored these tags.

Because you deleted its admin relation (which I restored afterwards, see below)

(At least, relation/272634 is broken now.)

This was quite incomplete, so the admin boundary is open now. Do you have any plans to close them again?